In re Thomlinson Co.

Decision Date13 May 1907
Docket Number77.
Citation154 F. 834
PartiesIn re THOMLINSON CO. et al.
CourtU.S. Court of Appeals — Eighth Circuit

Edward A. Haid (R. N. McConnell, on the brief), for petitioners.

Fred S Caldwell, for respondent.

Before SANBORN, HOOK, and ADAMS, Circuit Judges.

ADAMS Circuit Judge.

This is an original petition, filed October 1, 1906, by the bankrupt to revise in matter of law certain proceedings taken by a bankruptcy court in the territory of Oklahoma in the matter of Thomlinson Company, bankrupts. That court on May 26, 1905 denied the bankrupts' motion to quash service of the subpoena, and on May 12, 1906, ruled that a certain instrument executed by the bankrupts was a general assignment for the benefit of creditors, within the meaning of section 3, subd. 4 of the bankruptcy act of 1898, as amended by the act of February 5, 1903, and thereupon made the order of adjudication. To revise these two rulings, deemed by the petitioners to be erroneous, the present proceeding was instituted.

1. The petition to revise was filed more than 16 months after the order was made denying the motion to quash. An order can be challenged by an original petition in this court only when filed within 6 months after it was made. In re Holmes, 73 C.C.A. 491, 142 F. 391; Act March 3, 1891, c 517, Sec. 11, 26 Stat. 829 (U.S. Comp. St. 1901, p. 552). We therefore cannot consider the merits of the first question submitted to us.

2. The instrument claimed not to be a general assignment is as follows 'Bill of Sale.

'Oklahoma City, Okla., March 25, '05.

'Whereas, the undersigned is indebted to various parties whose claims are now due and payable, and that the undersigned is unable to pay the same in the regular and ordinary course of business, we hereby sell and set over to R. N. McConnell, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, in trust all of our general stock of merchandise situated at No. 6 West Grand Avenue, said city, with all our book accounts and matters receivable, amounting to about $2,397.14, conditioned that said R. N. McConnell will according to his judgment dispose and sell all of said stock of goods at retail or public sale, and collect all of said accounts, and with the proceeds pay pro rata all of our creditors, a list of which, with their address and respective amounts due, is hereto attached. That said proceeds as fast as realized by said trustee is to be paid over whenever there is sufficient funds to pay 10 per cent. dividend after having first paid whatever necessary expense there may have been incurred under said trust by way of replenishing said stock and conducting said business in the usual retail way. Immediate possession is hereby given to said R. N. McConnell on this day, and he is hereby directed to proceed and dispose of all of said assets, and pay all of said indebtedness so far as the assets will pay, and any surplus, if there be any, returned to the undersigned on demand.

(Signed) Thomlinson Company,

'Per A. Thomlinson.
'Witness: L. H. Carr.
'I accept the above and foregoing trust.

(Signed) R. N. McConnell, Trustee.'

McConnell took possession of the property conveyed, and proceeded to execute the trust imposed upon him. In our opinion the instrument in question was a general assignment for the benefit of creditors within the true meaning of the bankruptcy act, and was an act of bankruptcy warranting the adjudication. The 'general assignment' there contemplated is to be taken in its generic sense, and embraces any conveyance at common law or by s...

To continue reading

Request your trial
11 cases
  • United States v. Middle States Oil Corporation
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Eighth Circuit
    • March 14, 1927
    ...which does not prevent the actual appropriation of his property for the benefit of his creditors." Previously, in Re Thomlinson Co. et al. (C. C. A.) 154 F. 834, 835, this court said: "The `general assignment' there contemplated is to be taken in its generic sense, and embraces any conveyan......
  • Gill v. Farmers & Manufacturers Bank
    • United States
    • Kansas Court of Appeals
    • April 5, 1915
    ...in the trustee. National Bankruptcy Act, sec. 3, A-4, sec. 70, sec. 47; West Co. v. Lea Bros., 174 U.S. 590, 43 L.Ed. 1099; In re Tomlinson Co., 154 F. 834; Thomas v. Woods, 173 F. 585; Randolph Scruggs, 190 U.S. 533, 47 L.Ed. 1165; In re Sievers, 91 F. 366; Davis v. Bohle, 92 F. 325; Muell......
  • In re Carter-Williams Grain & Coal Co.
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Eighth Circuit
    • March 27, 1924
    ...petition must be dismissed. It was filed within the six months' period allowed, In re Holmes, 142 F. 391, 73 C.C.A. 491; In re Thomlinson Co., 154 F. 834, 83 C.C.A. 550, it was not accompanied with a copy of the order complained of. On the expiration of the six months respondent filed a mot......
  • In re Ambrose Matthews & Co.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — District of New Jersey
    • January 21, 1916
    ... ... sense, and embraces any conveyance, at common law or by ... statute, by which one intends to make an absolute and ... unconditional appropriation of all his property to pay his ... creditors, share and share alike. In re Thomlinson ... Co., 154 F. 834, 83 C.C.A. 550 (C.C.A. 8th Cir.), and ... cases there cited; Courtenay Mercantile Co. v. Finch et ... al., 194 F. 368, 114 C.C.A. 328 (C.C.A ... [229 F. 311.] ... 8th ... Cir.) ; In re Salmon & Salmon, 143 F. 395 (D.C.W.D ... Mo.); Missouri, etc., Elect. Co ... ...
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT