In re Vickers

Decision Date05 March 1907
PartiesIn re VICKERS.
CourtMissouri Supreme Court

E. Silver, for petitioner. The Attorney General and N. T. Gentry, for respondent.

GANTT, J.

The petitioner, charged and convicted of rape in the circuit court of Lewis county and sentenced to the penitentiary for 50 years, was by court permitted bail pending his appeal, but, being either unable of unwilling to give bail for supersedeas, moved the circuit court to supersede the judgment pending his appeal and permit him to remain in jail in Lewis county, which request the circuit court denied.

He has filed his petition in this court for a writ of habeas corpus, and seeks hereby to obtain an order remanding him to the Lewis county jail until his appeal is determined. He does not ask to be bailed. His contention is that by virtue of section 2698, Rev. St. 1899 [Ann. St. 1906, p. 1590], his appeal from the circuit court operated as a stay pending his appeal, and the circuit court had no discretion to deny him the supersedeas, and therefore he is entitled to an order returning him to the Lewis county jail. The insistence of the petitioner is based upon the proposition that rape under our statute (section 1837, Rev. St. 1899 [Ann. St. 1906, p. 1271]) is a capital offense, and by section 2698, Rev. St. 1899, it is provided that, "in capital cases, the order granting the appeal shall operate as such stay absolutely." In other felonies it is provided that an appeal or writ of error shall not stay or delay execution of the judgment or sentence unless the Supreme Court or the court in which the judgment is rendered, on inspection of the record, shall be of opinion there is probable cause for such an appeal or writ of error, and shall make an order directing the appeal or writ of...

To continue reading

Request your trial
7 cases
  • State v. Emrich
    • United States
    • Missouri Supreme Court
    • July 14, 1952
    ...deadly weapon' and the death penalty provided by Sec. 560.135 did not apply. The case submitted was not a capital one. Ex parte Vickers, 201 Mo. 643, 645, 100 S.W. 585. The assignment is Appellant contends the court erred in permitting the assistant attorney general to comment upon and disp......
  • Ex parte Berry
    • United States
    • Washington Supreme Court
    • March 21, 1939
    ...that any suggestion by the court of the effect of the verdict on the character of the offense was unnecessary to the decision. In the Vickers case, supra, the accused was charged with which, under the statute (Mo.St.Ann. § 3999, p. 2801), was a capital offense carrying alternative punishmen......
  • St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Company v. Stewart
    • United States
    • Missouri Supreme Court
    • March 5, 1907
  • St. Louis, I. M. & S. Ry. Co. v. Stewart
    • United States
    • Missouri Supreme Court
    • March 5, 1907
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT