In re Weaver
Decision Date | 16 May 2023 |
Docket Number | 23-35263 (CGM) |
Parties | In re: Everette Weaver, Debtor. |
Court | U.S. Bankruptcy Court — Southern District of New York |
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
Debtor filed this chapter 13 case on April 5, 2023. The case was filed as a barebones petition and is set for automatic dismissal for May 23, 2023. The Debtor lists his home address as 827 Route 82 Hopewell, NY, which is a UPS Store.
By this motion, Debtor asks this Court to refer a case to the Kings County District Attorney for a criminal investigation and to the Kings County Surrogate Court for adjudication. This litigation between the Debtor and various secured creditors has been ongoing for over a decade. Having been previously ruled against, denied access to, and prohibited from filing in other courts, Debtor has now come here to seek his relief.
Debtor moves under 18 U.S.C. § 4. That section of the criminal code states: "Whoever, having knowledge of the actual commission of a felony cognizable by a court of the United States, conceals and does not as soon as possible make known the same to some judge or other person in civil or military authority under the United States, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both." 18 U.S.C. § 4. He argues that "[t]his Court has a duty and responsibility to review the facts and evidence presented, make a determination whether a crime and conspiracy exits, submit proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law to the Kings County District attorney for an investigation as required by title 18 U.S.C. § 4, and to the Kings County Surrogate's Court for adjudication."
Debtor's reliance on 18 U.S.C. § 4 is misplaced. Section 4 of title 18 of the United States Code "defines a criminal offense and does not provide civil complainants with a private right of action." See Dugar v Coughlin, 613 F.Supp. 849, 852 n. 1 (S.D.N.Y.1985); Pankey v. Webster, 816 F.Supp. 553, 559 (W.D. Mo. 1993).
Additionally In re Sinclair, No. 14-91565-E-7, 2017 WL 1684120, at *21 .
Bankruptcy courts do not have the power to investigate crimes. 28 U.S.C. § 1334. The bankruptcy court is a court of limited jurisdiction. See Bd. of Governors v. MCorp Fin., Inc., 502 U.S. 32, 40 (1991). Bankruptcy courts fall outside of the constitutional authority of Article III and derive their authority from federal statutes. N. Pipeline Constr. Co. v. Marathon Pipe Line Co., 458 U.S. 50, 60-87 (1982) (plurality opinion); Celotex Corp. v. Edwards, 514 U.S. 300, 307 (1995) ( ). Two statutes, 28 U.S.C. §§ 157(a) and 1334, allow district courts to refer proceedings arising in, arising under, or related to a bankruptcy case, to bankruptcy courts. Although generally bankruptcy courts have jurisdiction to hear a wide array of matters, the exercise of bankruptcy court jurisdiction to enter any final order or judgment is limited to (1) "cases under title 11;" (2) "core" bankruptcy proceedings that either "arise under" the Bankruptcy Code or "arise in" a case under the Code; or (3) cases in which all interested parties consent to the bankruptcy court entering a final order in a matter that is "related to" a case under the Bankruptcy Code. In re Inglewood Woman's Club, Inc., No. 4:15-BK-15376-SHG, 2017 WL 2492530, at *4 (9th Cir B.A.P. June 7, 2017), aff'd, 708 Fed.Appx. 392 (9th Cir. 2017).
The Bankruptcy Court has jurisdiction over bankruptcy issues falling under title 11 and other civil proceedings. This Court cannot hear a criminal proceeding under title 18. While bankruptcy courts are free to make criminal referrals when they have "reasonable grounds for believing" that a bankruptcy crime has occurred, 18 U.S.C. § 3057, "the statute does not confer standing on litigants to request such a referral from the court." In re Baroni, 643 B.R. 253, 273 (Bankr. C.D. Cal. 2022).
Here...
To continue reading
Request your trial