In The Interest Of K.P.,a Child.

Decision Date25 August 2010
Docket NumberNo. A10A1358.,A10A1358.
Citation700 S.E.2d 665,305 Ga.App. 670
PartiesIn the Interest of K.P., a child.
CourtGeorgia Court of Appeals

OPINION TEXT STARTS HERE

Renata Newbill-Jallow, for appellant.

Richard A. Mallard, Dist. Atty., Kathy A. Bradley, Asst. Dist. Atty., for appellee.

MIKELL, Judge.

A delinquency petition was filed in the juvenile court charging K.P. with burglary. The state moved to transfer K.P.'s case to superior court, and the juvenile court granted the motion following a hearing. K.P. appeals from the transfer order, contending that the juvenile court erred by finding that his and the community's interests required the transfer to superior court and that he was not amenable to treatment in the juvenile system. We disagree and affirm.

Pursuant to OCGA § 15-11-30.2, a juvenile court has the discretion to transfer a case to superior court upon finding that

there are reasonable grounds to believe that the child committed the delinquent act alleged; the child is not committable to an institution for the mentally retarded or mentally ill; the interests of the child and the community require that the child be placed under legal restraint and the transfer be made; and the child was at least 15 years of age at the time of the alleged delinquent conduct. 1

On appeal from a transfer order, “the function of this Court is limited to ascertaining whether there was some evidence to support the juvenile court's determination that the requirements of OCGA § 15-11-30.2 have been met, and absent an abuse of discretion, we will affirm the order transferring jurisdiction.” 2

In the case at bar, the evidence supports the juvenile court's determination. Detective Tony Taylor of the Sylvania Police Department testified at the transfer hearing that three adults had been indicted for the burglary of a carwash that occurred on August 1, 2008. The adults implicated K.P. in the burglary, and K.P. gave a statement indicating that he had been at the carwash on the night of the burglary and had received “some money from it.”

Janeshia W. Warren, K.P.'s probation officer, testified that K.P.'s record included adjudications of delinquency for two aggravated assaults, affray, and burglary. The juvenile court had ordered K.P. to serve 60 days in a detention center, attend group meetings, perform community service, and comply with the conditions of his probation. K.P. violated the terms of his probation, however, as he failed to report as required or to attend group meetings. In addition, Warren testified that K.P. refused to report for his court-ordered competency evaluation, and the juvenile court had to order him detained to secure an evaluation. Warren also noted that K.P. moved out of his mother's home and into a different county. When asked whether a transfer to superior court would be appropriate for K.P.'s case, Warren replied: “That would be difficult to answer. I will just say this, it's easier to work with a child that has parental supervision and influence and because [K.P.] doesn't have that support-he doesn't live at home ... we can't facilitate the type relationship that we need in order to use juvenile services.” Warren testified that there was no further rehabilitation and treatment that the juvenile probation system could offer K.P.

Later in the hearing, K.P. stipulated that reasonable grounds existed to believe that he committed the burglary and that he is not committable to an institution for the mentally retarded or mentally ill. It is undisputed that he was 17 years old at the time of the hearing.

1. K.P. contends that the trial court abused its discretion in finding that his and the community's interests require that he be placed under legal restraint and the transfer be made. Specifically, he contends that he does not pose a serious threat to the community; that burglary is not a violent offense; and that his criminal conduct has not escalated since his first adjudication in 2007. But the juvenile court “is vested with broad discretion in determining whether reasonable grounds exist for transferring a delinquency petition to the appropriate court for prosecution of a crime or public offense.” 3

The juvenile court found that K.P. has an extensive history, in that he was charged with six offenses, including two counts of aggravated assault committed before the burglary at issue and two offenses, including burglary, since that time. Thus, his history includes adjudications on three felonies, including two designated felonies. The court further found that the disposition order on the first adjudication...

To continue reading

Request your trial
3 cases
  • Ga. Inv.s Int'l Inc. v. Banking
    • United States
    • Georgia Court of Appeals
    • August 25, 2010
    ... ... , that it would refinance the loan at issue or provide a line of credit to carry interest on the loan for 12 months. Howington relied on BB & T's promises and did not apply to a different ... ...
  • Cagle Constr. v. The Travelers Indem. Co.
    • United States
    • Georgia Court of Appeals
    • August 25, 2010
    ... ... 666The Travelers Indemnity Company (Travelers), as successor in interest to Gulf Insurance Company (Gulf), brought the instant lawsuit against Cagle's Construction, LLC ... ...
  • In re Of
    • United States
    • Georgia Court of Appeals
    • October 8, 2015
    ...sustained, health care expenses incurred, and lost earnings suffered.” SeeOCGA § 15–11–562(a)(5)(2015).4 See In the Interest of K.P.,305 Ga.App. 670, 670–71, 700 S.E.2d 665 (2010)(“On appeal from a transfer order, the function of this Court is limited to ascertaining whether there was some ......
1 books & journal articles
  • Construction Law - Frank O. Brown, Jr.
    • United States
    • Mercer University School of Law Mercer Law Reviews No. 63-1, September 2011
    • Invalid date
    ...45. Cagle, 305 Ga. App. at 669, 700 S.E.2d at 661. 46. Id. at 669-70, 700 S.E.2d at 661-62. 47. O.C.G.A. § 9-3-23 (2007). 48. Cagle, 305 Ga. App. at 670, 700 S.E.2d at 662. 49. 307 Ga. App. 398, 705 S.E.2d 191 (2010). of the arbitration, the owner filed a motion in court to stay the arbitra......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT