In the Matter of David Tyska v. Jensen
| Decision Date | 01 June 2010 |
| Citation | 74 A.D.3d 831,2010 N.Y. Slip Op. 04801,901 N.Y.S.2d 527 |
| Parties | In the Matter of David TYSKA, appellant,v.Mariane JENSEN, respondent. |
| Court | New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division |
OPINION TEXT STARTS HEREJason Bassett, Central Islip, N.Y., for appellant.Mariane Jensen, Murfreesboro, Tennessee, respondent pro se.Myrka A. Gonzalez, Sayville, N.Y., attorney for the child.
In a proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 6, the father appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Family Court, Suffolk County (Tarantino, Jr., J.), dated January 5, 2009, as granted the mother's cross petition to relocate to Tennessee with the parties' child.
ORDERED that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements.
There is a sound and substantial basis in the record for the Family Court's determination to grant the mother's cross petition to relocate to Tennessee with the parties' child ( see Matter of Tropea v. Tropea, 87 N.Y.2d 727, 738, 642 N.Y.S.2d 575, 665 N.E.2d 145; Matter of Aruty v. Mormando, 70 A.D.3d 683, 892 N.Y.S.2d 875; Matter of Wirth v. Wirth, 56 A.D.3d 787, 788, 869 N.Y.S.2d 138). The father's claim that the Family Court should have ordered a forensic evaluation of him before determining the mother's cross petition is without merit ( compare Matter of Rovenia G.M. v. Lesley P.A., 44 A.D.3d 942, 943–944, 846 N.Y.S.2d 192).
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
People v. Agina
...N.Y.S.2d 8674 A.D.3d 831The PEOPLE, etc., respondent,v.Alaa AGINA, appellant.Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.June 1, 2010.903 N.Y.S.2d 87 Lynn W.L. Fahey, New York, N.Y. (Lisa Napoli of counsel), for appellant, and appellant pro se. Richard A. Brown, District ......
-
Otero v. Nieves
...658, 436 N.E.2d 1260; Friederwitzer v. Friederwitzer, 55 N.Y.2d 89, 93, 447 N.Y.S.2d 893, 432 N.E.2d 765; Matter of Tyska v. Jensen, 74 A.D.3d 831, 901 N.Y.S.2d 527; Matter of Tabernuro v. Jones, 23 A.D.3d 667, 807 N.Y.S.2d 606; Matter of Brackman v. Debrest, 276 A.D.2d 483, 713 N.Y.S.2d 87......
-
Tahmisyan v. Stony Brook Univ.
..."[A]bsent extraordinary circumstances, courts are constrained not to interject themselves into ongoing administrative proceedings74 A.D.3d 831until final resolution of those proceedings before the agency" ( Galin v. Chassin, 217 A.D.2d 446, 447, 629 N.Y.S.2d 247). Here, the instant proceedi......
- Agudo v. Zhinin