In the Matter of Patricia J. Smith v. Smith
| Decision Date | 28 June 2011 |
| Citation | 2011 N.Y. Slip Op. 05716,927 N.Y.S.2d 120,85 A.D.3d 1188 |
| Parties | In the Matter of Patricia J. SMITH, respondent,v.Charles J. SMITH, appellant. |
| Court | New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division |
OPINION TEXT STARTS HERE
John A. Reno, Deer Park, N.Y., for appellant.
Sallah Law Firm, P.C., Holtsville, N.Y. (Dean J. Sallah of counsel), for respondent.WILLIAM F. MASTRO, J.P., ARIEL E. BELEN, SANDRA L. SGROI, and ROBERT J. MILLER, JJ.
In a support proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 4, the husband appeals from an order of the Family Court, Suffolk County (Hoffmann, J.), dated May 5, 2010, which denied his objections to an order of the same court (Joseph–Cherry, S.M.), dated March 8, 2010, which, after a hearing, granted the wife's petition for awards of child support and spousal support.
ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with costs.
Contrary to the husband's contention, the Family Court properly denied his objections to the Support Magistrate's order. The record supports the Support Magistrate's determination that the parties' son was not emancipated. A parent is obligated to support his or her child until the age of 21 ( see Family Ct. Act § 413) unless the child becomes emancipated, which occurs once the child becomes economically independent through employment and is self-supporting ( see Matter of Thomas B. v. Lydia D., 69 A.D.3d 24, 886 N.Y.S.2d 22). In the present case, although the parties' son worked full-time, paid for his own car insurance, and paid for his own cell phone, the fact that his mother still paid for his food, shelter, clothing, and health and dental insurance, demonstrates that he was not economically independent of his parents ( see Matter of Thomas B. v. Lydia D., 69 A.D.3d 24, 886 N.Y.S.2d 22; Matter of Bogin v. Goodrich, 265 A.D.2d 779, 696 N.Y.S.2d 317; cf. Matter of Lowe v. Lowe, 67 A.D.3d 682, 888 N.Y.S.2d 163; Matter of Fortunato v. Fortunato, 242 A.D.2d 720, 662 N.Y.S.2d 579).
The award of $200 per month is a fair and reasonable sum for the support of the wife based on her needs and the husband's means ( see Matter of Nisita v. Nisita, 81 A.D.3d 832, 916 N.Y.S.2d 815; Matter of Shreffler v. Shreffler, 283 A.D.2d 679, 724 N.Y.S.2d 121; Polite v. Polite, 127 A.D.2d 465, 511 N.Y.S.2d 275).
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Lueders v. Boma–lueders
... ... , child support, and equitable distribution are vacated, and the matter is remitted to the Supreme Court, Rockland County, for a trial on the ... ...
-
Cedeno v. Knowlton
...which occurs once the child becomes economically independent through employment and is self-supporting” (Matter of Smith v. Smith, 85 A.D.3d 1188, 1188, 927 N.Y.S.2d 120;see Matter of Drumm v. Drumm, 88 A.D.3d 1110, 1112–1113, 931 N.Y.S.2d 180;Matter of Burr v. Fellner, 73 A.D.3d 1041, 1041......
-
Vayner v. Tselniker
..."occurs once the child becomes economically independent through employment and is self-supporting" ( Matter of Smith v. Smith, 85 A.D.3d 1188, 1188, 927 N.Y.S.2d 120 ; see Matter of Monti v. DiBedendetto, 151 A.D.3d at 865, 56 N.Y.S.3d 544 ). "The fact that a child may work full time is not......
-
Melgar v. Melgar
...is self-supporting’ ” (Matter of Cedeno v. Knowlton, 98 A.D.3d 1257, 1257, 951 N.Y.S.2d 412 ; see Matter of Smith v. Smith, 85 A.D.3d 1188, 1188, 927 N.Y.S.2d 120 ). “The fact that a child may work full time is not determinative, as a child cannot be deemed economically independent if he or......