In the Matter of Bhanote v. Bhanote, 2004-09123.

Citation803 N.Y.S.2d 651,22 A.D.3d 490,2005 NY Slip Op 07370
Decision Date03 October 2005
Docket Number2004-09123.
PartiesIn the Matter of TERESA BHANOTE, Appellant, v. KULDIP R. BHANOTE, Respondent.
CourtNew York Supreme Court Appellate Division

Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law and the facts, with costs, the petition is reinstated, and the matter is remitted to the Family Court, Queens County, for a dispositional hearing and the entry of an appropriate order of disposition.

Contrary to the Family Court's determination, the petitioner established, by a fair preponderance of the evidence, that the respondent committed acts constituting harassment in the second degree and disorderly conduct, warranting the issuance of an order of protection against him (see Family Ct Act § 812 [1]; § 832; Penal Law § 240.26 [3]; § 240.20; Matter of Clarke v. Clarke, 8 AD3d 375 [2004]; Matter of Pesce v. Pesce, 223 AD2d 647 [1996]). Accordingly, the matter is remitted to the Family Court for a dispositional hearing and entry of an appropriate dispositional order (see Family Ct Act §§ 833, 841 [d]; § 842).

Cozier, J.P., S. Miller, Rivera and Fisher, JJ., concur.

To continue reading

Request your trial
2 cases
  • Hubbard v. Deleon
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court Appellate Division
    • July 10, 2013
    ...66 A.D.3d 1021, 1022, 887 N.Y.S.2d 682;Matter of Miriam M. v. Warren M., 51 A.D.3d 581, 859 N.Y.S.2d 66;Matter of Bhanote v. Bhanote, 22 A.D.3d 490, 803 N.Y.S.2d 651). Further, the Family Court's finding that aggravating circumstances were present was supported by the record ( seeFamily Ct.......
  • In the Matter of Cancilla v. Cancilla, 2003-10183.
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court Appellate Division
    • October 3, 2005

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT