In the Matter of Williams v. Doherty, 4937.
Decision Date | 16 December 2004 |
Docket Number | 4937. |
Citation | 2004 NY Slip Op 09380,785 N.Y.S.2d 914,13 A.D.3d 185 |
Parties | In the Matter of BILL WILLIAMS, Petitioner, v. JOHN DOHERTY, as Commissioner of the New York City Sanitation Department, et al., Respondents. |
Court | New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division |
Substantial evidence supports the determination that petitioner violated various of respondent's rules and regulations. No basis exists to disturb respondent's findings of credibility (see Matter of Berenhaus v Ward, 70 NY2d 436, 443-444 [1987]). In view of petitioner's history of discipline over a relatively short period of employment, the penalty does not shock our sense of fairness.
To continue reading
Request your trial3 cases
-
O'Neill v. Doherty
...years at the time of the violation and he had multiple prior disciplinary infractions for misconduct ( see Matter of Williams v. Doherty, 13 A.D.3d 185, 785 N.Y.S.2d 914 [2004] ).TOM, J.P., SWEENY, DeGRASSE, ABDUS–SALAAM, MANZANET–DANIELS, JJ., ...
- Semi-Tech Litigation, L.L.C. v. Ting
- People v. Velazquez, 4935.