In the Matter of Sayegh v. Scannapieco, 2004-07050.
Decision Date | 20 August 2004 |
Docket Number | 2004-07050. |
Citation | 780 N.Y.S.2d 743,10 A.D.3d 439,2004 NY Slip Op 06399 |
Parties | In the Matter of WILLIAM G. SAYEGH et al., Appellants, v. ANTHONY G. SCANNAPIECO, JR., et al., Respondents, et al., Respondent. |
Court | New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division |
Ordered that the final order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.
Contrary to the appellants' contention, the Supreme Court properly denied the petition for failure to commence the proceeding within the time prescribed by Election Law § 16-102 (2) (see Matter of Wilson v Garfinkle, 5 AD3d 409 [2004]; Matter of Marino v Orange County Bd. of Elections, 307 AD2d 1011 [2003]; Matter of Krenzer v Town of Caledonia Zoning Bd. of Appeals, 233 AD2d 882 [1996]; see also Krenzer v Town of Caledonia Zoning Bd. of Appeals, 167 Misc 2d 708 [1995]; Matter of Eckart v Edelstein, 185 AD2d 955 [1992]).
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Nowinski v. N.Y.C. Bd. of Elections
...as untimely, as it was not commenced within the period prescribed by Election Law § 16–102(2) (see Matter of Sayegh v. Scannapieco, 10 A.D.3d 439, 780 N.Y.S.2d 743 ; Matter of Krupczak v. Mancini, 153 A.D.2d 785, 786, 545 N.Y.S.2d 51 ). Although the petitioners commenced this proceeding pur......
-
Gangemi v. Bd. of Elections in the City of N.Y.
...906;Matter of Leroy v. Board of Elections in City of N.Y., 65 A.D.3d at 645–646, 883 N.Y.S.2d 907;Matter of Sayegh v. Scannapieco, 10 A.D.3d 439, 780 N.Y.S.2d 743). [970 N.Y.S.2d 471] In light of the foregoing, the petitioner's remaining contentions have been rendered academic.DILLON, J.P.,......