In the Matter of Empire Golf Management LLC v. Olivieri, 6137.
Decision Date | 19 May 2005 |
Docket Number | 6137. |
Citation | 794 N.Y.S.2d 649,18 A.D.3d 334,2005 NY Slip Op 04129 |
Parties | In the Matter of EMPIRE GOLF MANAGEMENT, LLC, Respondent, v. ALESSANDRO G. OLIVIERI, as Records Access Appeals Officer of the Department of Parks and Recreation of the City of New York, et al., Appellants. |
Court | New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division |
The winning proposals should be disclosed since the submission process had ended, the winning proposals were identified, and contract negotiations were well underway. Given these circumstances, the winning proposals could no longer be considered "competitively sensitive" and therefore exempt from FOIL disclosure under Public Officers Law § 87 (2) (c) (see Matter of Cross-Sound Ferry Servs. v Department of Transp., 219 AD2d 346, 349 [1995]).
To continue reading
Request your trial5 cases
-
Weinstock v. N.Y. State Urban Dev. Corp.
... ... State Urban Development Corporation d/b/a EMPIRE STATE DEVELOPMENT, Respondent Index No ... Law § 87(2)(c)." Empire Golf Mgt., LLC v ... Olivieri , 18 A.D.3d 334, 335 ... ...
-
Weinstock v. N.Y. State Urban Dev. Corp.
... ... STATE URBAN DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION d/b/a EMPIRE STATE DEVELOPMENT, Respondent Index No ... Empire Golf Mgt., LLC v. Olivieri , 18 A.D.3d 334, ... 335 ... ...
-
ACME Bus Corp. v. Cnty. of Suffolk
...there was no basis for the respondents to deny disclosure under Public Officers Law § 87(2)(c) (see Matter of Empire Golf Mgt., LLC v. Olivieri, 18 A.D.3d 334, 334–335, 794 N.Y.S.2d 649 ; Matter of Cross– Sound Ferry Servs. v. Department of Transp., 219 A.D.2d 346, 349, 634 N.Y.S.2d 575 ). ......
-
Richard Miller & Power Equip. & Design, LLC v. David Rodriguez, Joellen Rodriguez & Contact Power, Inc.
...to the public via Freedom of Information Act or New York's Freedom of Information Law requests. Id. (citing Empire Golf Management, LLC v. Olivieri, 794 N.Y.S.2d 649 (2005) ("once submission process had ended, proposals were no longer 'competitively sensitive.'")) As a result, Defendants co......
Request a trial to view additional results