IN THE MATTER OF ABRAHAMS

CourtNew York Court of Appeals
Citation1 N.Y.3d 619,808 NE 2d 1273
PartiesIn the Matter of SOLOMON ABRAHAMS, a Suspended Attorney, Appellant. GRIEVANCE COMMITTEE FOR THE NINTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT, Respondent.
Decision Date24 February 2004

1 N.Y.3d 619
808 NE 2d 1273

In the Matter of SOLOMON ABRAHAMS, a Suspended Attorney, Appellant.
GRIEVANCE COMMITTEE FOR THE NINTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York.

Submitted February 17, 2004.

Decided February 24, 2004.


Appeal, insofar as taken from the Appellate Division order

1 N.Y.3d 620
denying appellant's motion to vacate his interim suspension, dismissed, without costs, by the Court of Appeals, sua sponte, upon the ground that the order appealed from does not finally determine the proceeding within the meaning of the Constitution; appeal, insofar as taken from the final Appellate Division disciplinary order, dismissed, without costs, by the Court of Appeals, sua sponte, upon the ground that no appeal lies as of right from the unanimous order of the Appellate Division absent the direct involvement of a substantial constitutional question (CPLR 5601).

To continue reading

Request your trial
1 practice notes
  • Abrahams v. Appellate Div. Of Supreme Court, No. 05 Civ. 4053(SCR)(GAY).
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 2nd Circuit. United States District Courts. 2nd Circuit. Southern District of New York
    • February 7, 2007
    ...to appeal as of right the unanimous order as there was no "direct involvement of a substantial constitutional question." In re Abrahams, 1 N.Y.3d 619, 620, 808 N.E.2d 1273, 1273, 777 N.Y.S.2d 13, 14 (2004). Soon thereafter, the Court of Appeals then denied leave to appeal. In re Abrahams, 3......
1 cases
  • Abrahams v. Appellate Div. Of Supreme Court, No. 05 Civ. 4053(SCR)(GAY).
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 2nd Circuit. United States District Courts. 2nd Circuit. Southern District of New York
    • February 7, 2007
    ...to appeal as of right the unanimous order as there was no "direct involvement of a substantial constitutional question." In re Abrahams, 1 N.Y.3d 619, 620, 808 N.E.2d 1273, 1273, 777 N.Y.S.2d 13, 14 (2004). Soon thereafter, the Court of Appeals then denied leave to appeal. In re Abrahams, 3......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT