In the Matter of Franklin v. Miner

• Decision Date: 08 June 2006
• Citation: 850 N.E.2d 1163,7 N.Y.3d 735
• Parties: In the Matter of Frederick FRANKLIN, Respondent, v. Tara Christie MINER, as Records Access Officer, New York County District Attorney's Office, Respondent. Association of Surrogate's and Supreme Court Reporters Within the City of New York, Intervenor-Appellant.
• Court: New York Court of Appeals Court of Appeals

850 N.E.2d 1163

7 N.Y.3d 735

In the Matter of Frederick FRANKLIN, Respondent, v. Tara Christie MINER, as Records Access Officer, New York County District Attorney's Office, Respondent. Association of Surrogate's and Supreme Court Reporters Within the City of New York, Intervenor-Appellant.

Court of Appeals of New York.

June 8, 2006.

Reported below, 21 A.D.3d 276, 799 N.Y.S.2d 417.

Motion for leave to appeal denied. The Court of Appeals restates the rule that denial of a motion for leave to appeal is not equivalent to an affirmance and has no precedential value (see Matter of Marchant v. Mead-Morrison Mfg. Co., 252 N.Y. 284, 297-298, 169 N.E. 386 (1929), [Cardozo, Ch.J.]).