In the Matter of Michael Ww.

Decision Date11 May 2006
Docket Number98966.
Citation814 N.Y.S.2d 797,29 A.D.3d 1105,2006 NY Slip Op 03664
PartiesIn the Matter of MICHAEL WW. and Another, Alleged to be the Children of a Mentally Retarded and Mentally Ill Parent. CLINTON COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES, Respondent; HARRY WW., Appellant.
CourtNew York Supreme Court — Appellate Division

Appeal from an order of the Family Court of Clinton County (Lawliss, J.), entered September 16, 2005, which partially granted petitioner's application, in a proceeding pursuant to Social Services Law § 384-b, to adjudicate respondent's children to be the children of a mentally retarded and mentally ill parent, and terminated respondent's parental rights.

Kane, J.

Respondent's two sons came into petitioner's care after Family Court adjudicated them abused and neglected by respondent and his wife (see Matter of Michael WW., 20 AD3d 609 [2005]). Petitioner filed a petition seeking to terminate respondent's parental rights based on his mental illness and mental retardation. After a fact-finding hearing, the court dismissed the portion of the petition based on mental retardation, finding that the evidence failed to support the necessary conclusion that respondent's mental retardation originated during the developmental period. The court credited the testimony of Richard Liotta, a licensed psychologist who testified as petitioner's witness, accepted his diagnoses that respondent suffered from impulse control disorder and a personality disorder, and found that this mental illness prevented respondent from being able to provide proper care for his children now and in the foreseeable future. Based on these findings, the court terminated respondent's parental rights to his two sons and transferred the sons to petitioner's custody to be freed for adoption. Respondent appeals.

We affirm. Petitioner was required to establish by clear and convincing evidence that respondent suffers from mental illness and that by reason of that mental illness he "is presently, and will continue for the foreseeable future to be, unable to provide proper and adequate care for the children" (Matter of Donald W., 17 AD3d 728, 729 [2005], lv denied 5 NY3d 705 [2005]; see Social Services Law § 384-b [4] [c]; Matter of Alexis X., 23 AD3d 945, 946 [2005]). Liotta's report and testimony established respondent's mental illness without any refutation (see Matter of Donald W., supra at 729).

Giving deference to Family Court's credibility determinations and factual findings regarding the effect of that mental illness on respondent's parenting abilities, clear and convincing evidence supported the court's determination (see Matter of Alexis X., supra at 947). The court took judicial notice of its prior finding that ...

To continue reading

Request your trial
6 cases
  • In re Burton C.
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • 12 Enero 2012
    ...2012 N.Y. Slip Op. 0014091 A.D.3d 1038937 N.Y.S.2d 362In the Matter of BURTON C. and another, Alleged to be Permanently Neglected Children and/or the Children of a Mentally Ill and/or Mentally Retarded Parent.Essex ... 12, 2012 ... [937 N.Y.S.2d 363] Claudia A. Russell, Willsboro, for appellant.Daniel T. Manning III, County Attorney, Elizabethtown (Michael J. Gallant of counsel), for respondent.Lynne E. Ackner, Glens Falls, attorney for the children.Before: MERCURE, Acting P.J., PETERS, ROSE, LAHTINEN ... ...
  • Clinton Cnty. Dep't of Soc. Servs. v. Harold SS. (In re Adrianahmarie SS.)
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • 18 Octubre 2012
    ...99 A.D.3d 1072953 N.Y.S.2d 6972012 N.Y. Slip Op. 07013In the Matter of ADRIANAHMARIE SS. and Another, Alleged to be the Children of a Mentally Ill Parent.Clinton County Department of Social Services, ... [953 N.Y.S.2d 698]Reginald H. Bedell, Elizabethtown, for Harold SS., appellant.Cynthia Feathers, Glens Falls, for Roxann M., appellant.Michael J. Hartnett, Clinton County Department of Social Services, Plattsburgh, for respondent.[953 N.Y.S.2d 699]Omshanti Parnes, Plattsburgh, attorney for ... ...
  • In re Darren HH.
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • 1 Abril 2010
    ...898 N.Y.S.2d 31572 A.D.3d 1147In the Matter of DARREN HH., a Neglected Child.Clinton County Department of Social Services, Respondent;Amber HH. et al., Appellants. (Proceeding No. 1.)In the ... that their mental illness renders them unable to provide adequate care for their children now and for the foreseeable future ( see Matter of Michael WW., 29 A.D.3d 1105, 1106, 814 N.Y.S.2d 797 [2006] ); Matter of Alexis X., 23 A.D.3d 945, 804 N.Y.S.2d 481 [2005], lv. denied 6 N.Y.3d 710, 814 ... ...
  • In re Sean S.
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • 30 Diciembre 2010
    ...913 N.Y.S.2d 63279 A.D.3d 1760In the Matter of SEAN S.Oneida County Department of Social Services, Petitioner-Respondent;Tina S., Also known as Tina G., Respondent-Appellant.Supreme Court, ... 1, 2010]; Matter of Michael WW., 29 A.D.3d 1105, 1106, 814 N.Y.S.2d 797). We reject the further contention of the mother that Family Court erred in denying her request for ... ...
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT