In the Matter of Samantha B.
Decision Date | 15 March 2004 |
Docket Number | 2002-08253. |
Citation | 773 N.Y.S.2d 450,5 A.D.3d 590,2004 NY Slip Op 01774 |
Parties | In the Matter of SAMANTHA B. ADMINISTRATION FOR CHILDREN'S SERVICES, Respondent; CAROLINA B. et al., Appellants. (Proceeding No. 1.) In the Matter of JONATHAN B. ADMINISTRATION FOR CHILDREN'S SERVICES, Respondent; CAROLINA B. et al., Appellants. (Proceeding No. 2.) In the Matter of DOMINIC B. ADMINISTRATION FOR CHILDREN'S SERVICES, Respondent; CAROLINA B. et al., Appellants. (Proceeding No. 3.) In the Matter of RICHARD B. ADMINISTRATION FOR CHILDREN'S SERVICES, Respondent; CAROLINA B. et al., Appellants. (Proceeding No. 4.) In the Matter of BRYAN B. ADMINISTRATION FOR CHILDREN'S SERVICES, Respondent; CAROLINA B. et al., Appellants. (Proceeding No. 5.) |
Court | New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division |
Ordered that the fact-finding order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.
Contrary to the separate contentions of the mother and the father, the findings of neglect against each of them are supported by a fair preponderance of the evidence (see Family Ct Act § 1012). Where, as here, the Family Court was confronted primarily with issues of credibility, its factual findings are entitled to considerable deference on appeal unless clearly unsupported by the record (see Matter of Commissioner of Admin. for Children's Servs. of City of N.Y. [Marcel A.], 254 AD2d 416 [1998]; Matter of Orange County Dept. of Social Servs. [Charity G.] v John G., 208 AD2d 844 [1994]). Under the circumstances presented here, we find no basis to disturb the Family Court's determination that Richard B. and Bryan B. were neglected as a result of excessive discipline being inflicted upon the former by the father, and by the parents' failure to seek prompt medical attention for the latter after he fell down a flight of steps and lost consciousness. Since these incidents demonstrate a fundamental defect in the parents' understanding of the duties of parenthood, the Family Court properly determined that Samantha B., Jonathan B., and Dominic B. were derivatively-neglected children (see Matter of Dutchess County Dept. of Social Servs. [Douglas E., III] v Douglas E., Jr., 191 AD2d...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Admin. for Children's Servs. v. Benellie R. (In re Zaire D.)
...647, 915 N.Y.S.2d 867; see Matter of Andrew B. [ Deborah B.], 73 A.D.3d 1036, 900 N.Y.S.2d 661; [90 A.D.3d 924] Matter of Samantha B., 5 A.D.3d 590, 591, 773 N.Y.S.2d 450). The fact that the father was seeking custody of the child did not require wholesale rejection of his testimony, which ......
-
Admin. for Children's Servs. v. Kareena H. (In re Kayden H.)
...its burden of proving by a fair preponderance of the evidence that the appellants neglected the subject child ( see Matter of Samantha B., 5 A.D.3d 590, 591, 773 N.Y.S.2d 450;Matter of Victoria CC., 256 A.D.2d 931, 932–933, 681 N.Y.S.2d 870). I disagree with their conclusion that the Family......
-
In re Melissa O.
...issues of credibility is "entitled to considerable deference on appeal unless clearly unsupported by the record" ( Matter of Samantha B., 5 A.D.3d 590, 591, 773 N.Y.S.2d 450), in the instant case, the Family Court's credibility determination is not supported by the record. Upon review of th......
- Walker v. Mount Vernon Hospital