IN THE MATTER OF JD
Decision Date | 12 August 2004 |
Docket Number | No. 240P04.,240P04. |
Citation | 358 N.C. 732,601 S.E.2d 531 |
Court | North Carolina Supreme Court |
Parties | In the Matter of J.D., Minor Child. Appealed by Buncombe County Department of Social Services. |
Charlotte A. Wade, for Buncombe County DSS.
Diane K. McDonald, Asheville, for Mother.
Judy Randolph, Asheville, for Guardian ad Litem.
Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 19th day of May 2004 by Petitioner (Buncombe County DSS) in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:
"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 12th day of August 2004."
To continue reading
Request your trial-
In re A.L.G.
...to make separation of the two virtually, if not, impossible." 164 N.C.App. 176, 182, 605 S.E.2d 643, 646, disc. review denied, 358 N.C. 732, 601 S.E.2d 531 (2004). We recently applied the analysis of In re J.D. to that of section 7B-602 as well. See In re C.B., ___ N.C.App. ___, 614 S.E.2d ......
-
In re J.M.W.
...neglect were so intertwined at times as to make separation of the two virtually, if not, impossible."), disc. review denied, 358 N.C. 732, 601 S.E.2d 531 (2004). Indeed, the question of whether the appointment of a guardian ad litem is required is controlled by "the substance of the trial c......
-
In the Matter of A.A.W., No. COA06-550 (N.C. App. 12/19/2006)
...here at all. See B.M., 168 N.C. App. 350, 607 S.E.2d 698; In re J.D., 164 N.C. App. 176, 605 S.E.2d 643, disc. review denied, 358 N.C. 732, 601 S.E.2d 531 (2004). We conclude that the requirement of N.C. Gen. Stat. . 7B-1101 (2003), that respondent be appointed a guardian ad litem because s......
-
In the Matter of A.J., No. COA06-364 (N.C. App. 12/19/2006)
...guardian ad litem was required to be appointed. In re J.D., 164 N.C. App. 176, 182, 605 S.E.2d 643, 646, disc. review denied, 358 N.C. 732, 601 S.E.2d 531 (2004); see also In re L.W., __ N.C. App. __, __, 623 S.E.2d 626, 629 (quoting In re T.W., L.W., E.H., 173 N.C. App. 153, 159-60, 617 S.......