IN THE MATTER OF JD

Decision Date12 August 2004
Docket NumberNo. 240P04.,240P04.
Citation358 N.C. 732,601 S.E.2d 531
CourtNorth Carolina Supreme Court
PartiesIn the Matter of J.D., Minor Child. Appealed by Buncombe County Department of Social Services.

Charlotte A. Wade, for Buncombe County DSS.

Diane K. McDonald, Asheville, for Mother.

Judy Randolph, Asheville, for Guardian ad Litem.

ORDER

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 19th day of May 2004 by Petitioner (Buncombe County DSS) in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 12th day of August 2004."

To continue reading

Request your trial
23 cases
  • In re A.L.G.
    • United States
    • North Carolina Supreme Court
    • October 4, 2005
    ...to make separation of the two virtually, if not, impossible." 164 N.C.App. 176, 182, 605 S.E.2d 643, 646, disc. review denied, 358 N.C. 732, 601 S.E.2d 531 (2004). We recently applied the analysis of In re J.D. to that of section 7B-602 as well. See In re C.B., ___ N.C.App. ___, 614 S.E.2d ......
  • In re J.M.W.
    • United States
    • North Carolina Court of Appeals
    • October 17, 2006
    ...neglect were so intertwined at times as to make separation of the two virtually, if not, impossible."), disc. review denied, 358 N.C. 732, 601 S.E.2d 531 (2004). Indeed, the question of whether the appointment of a guardian ad litem is required is controlled by "the substance of the trial c......
  • In the Matter of A.A.W., No. COA06-550 (N.C. App. 12/19/2006)
    • United States
    • North Carolina Court of Appeals
    • December 19, 2006
    ...here at all. See B.M., 168 N.C. App. 350, 607 S.E.2d 698; In re J.D., 164 N.C. App. 176, 605 S.E.2d 643, disc. review denied, 358 N.C. 732, 601 S.E.2d 531 (2004). We conclude that the requirement of N.C. Gen. Stat. . 7B-1101 (2003), that respondent be appointed a guardian ad litem because s......
  • In the Matter of A.J., No. COA06-364 (N.C. App. 12/19/2006)
    • United States
    • North Carolina Court of Appeals
    • December 19, 2006
    ...guardian ad litem was required to be appointed. In re J.D., 164 N.C. App. 176, 182, 605 S.E.2d 643, 646, disc. review denied, 358 N.C. 732, 601 S.E.2d 531 (2004); see also In re L.W., __ N.C. App. __, __, 623 S.E.2d 626, 629 (quoting In re T.W., L.W., E.H., 173 N.C. App. 153, 159-60, 617 S.......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT