IN THE MATTER OF BRADLEY

• Decision Date: 17 September 2001
• Docket Number: No. S01Y0634.,S01Y0634.
• Citation: 552 S.E.2d 844,274 Ga. 244
• Parties: In the Matter of Paul A. BRADLEY.
• Court: Georgia Supreme Court

552 S.E.2d 844
274 Ga. 244

In the Matter of Paul A. BRADLEY

No. S01Y0634.

Supreme Court of Georgia.

September 17, 2001.

William P. Smith, III, Gen. Counsel State Bar, Elizabeth M. Williamson, Asst. Gen. Counsel State Bar, for State Bar of Georgia.

Paul A. Bradley, Atlanta, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The State Bar filed a Notice of Discipline against Respondent Paul A. Bradley alleging violations of Standards 22 (lawyer shall not withdraw from employment until he has taken reasonable steps to avoid foreseeable prejudice to the rights of his client, including giving due notice, allowing time for employment of other counsel, delivering all papers and property to which the client is entitled and complying with applicable laws and rules); 44 (lawyer shall not without just cause to the detriment of his client in effect wilfully abandon [274 Ga. 245] or disregard a legal matter entrusted to him); and 68 (failure to respond to disciplinary authorities) of Bar Rule 4-102(d). Although Bradley acknowledged service of the Notice of Investigation and was personally served with the Notice of Discipline, he failed to file a response to the Notice of Investigation as required by Bar Rule 4-204.3 or file a Notice of Rejection within the time set forth in Bar Rule 4-208.3(a).

552 S.E.2d 845

Accordingly, under Bar Rule 4-208.1(b), Bradley is in default, has no right to an evidentiary hearing, and is subject to discipline by this Court. The State Bar has recommended disbarment as the appropriate sanction in this case and we agree

The facts as deemed admitted by Bradley's default show that in 1995, a client retained Bradley to represent a building company in a legal matter against the Housing Authority of the City of Augusta, and that Bradley filed suit on the company's behalf in Fulton County Superior Court. The suit was transferred to Richmond County in October 1995. In August 1999 the client discussed the status of the case with Bradley and from November 1999 through May 2000, the client made numerous attempts to contact Bradley, but Bradley failed to respond to any of the client's messages. Finally, the client sent Bradley a certified letter terminating his services and requesting the return of the file. The letter was returned as undeliverable and the private investigator the client hired could not locate Bradley. The client hired new counsel to represent the company in the lawsuit.

In requesting disbarment, the State Bar noted in aggravation of the...