In the Matter of Moran, 71-1135.

Decision Date18 February 1972
Docket NumberNo. 71-1135.,71-1135.
PartiesIn the Matter of John Henry MORAN, Appellant, Bankrupt.
CourtU.S. Court of Appeals — Third Circuit

John Henry Moran, pro se.

Leo Neiwirth, Newark, N. J., for appellee.

Before McLAUGHLIN, HASTIE and VAN DUSEN, Circuit Judges.

OPINION OF THE COURT

PER CURIAM:

This is an appeal from an order of the district court affirming Referee Lipkin's order denying appellant's discharge in bankruptcy. The Referee's refusal to discharge the debtor was based on the grounds that he knowingly and fraudulently made a false oath in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 152.

On October 9, 1968, appellant filed a Wage Earners' Petition and Schedules, seeking an extension of time to pay his debts under the provisions of Chapter XIII of the Bankruptcy Act. At that time he failed to list "The Tuition Plan of New Hampshire, Inc.," to whom he was indebted, as one of his creditors. Appellant defaulted in his Wage Earners' payments which resulted in the dismissal of the Chapter XIII proceedings and an adjudication in the bankruptcy on June 18, 1969. On June 20, 1969, the debtor filed an Application for Leave to Amend Schedules to include as an unsecured creditor "The Tuition Plan of New Hampshire, Inc." in the amount of $1,700.80. The reason given for the failure to previously list the claim was ". . . applicant through inadvertence forgot to list the aforementioned debts." Tuition Plan objected to debtor's being discharged in bankruptcy based on the fact that debtor committed an offense punishable by imprisonment under 18 U.S.C. § 152 in that he had knowingly and fraudulently made a false oath to the Schedules and Statements of Affairs, previously filed by him. The Referee denied the discharge which was subsequently reviewed by Judge Barlow who affirmed that decision. Appellant now appeals to this Court. He states that there was no intent to commit fraud and therefore the denial of discharge was in error.

The actions of the debtor clearly show that he was aware of the debt when he filed the Wage Earners' Petition. We cannot believe that he "forgot" to include Tuition Plan when he received $500 from it less than two weeks before filing and continued to pay installments to it of $66.25 per month for a few months. On January 1, 1969 he received still another $500 from Tuition Plan. Certainly had Tuition Plan been aware of the Chapter XIII proceedings it would not have advanced an additional $500. The Referee was correct in his finding that the omission of Tuition Plan on the list of creditors was intended to mislead that creditor and was a material issue in the bankruptcy proceeding. The acts of the debtor demonstrate that he wilfully and knowingly made a false oath so that h...

To continue reading

Request your trial
11 cases
  • In re Jones, 73-2496 Summary Calendar.
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Fifth Circuit
    • 25 d1 Fevereiro d1 1974
    ...court, and appellate courts should interfere only for the most cogent, compelling reasons in situations of gross abuse. In the Matter of Moran, 3 Cir. 1972, 456 F.2d 1030, cert. denied, 409 U.S. 872, 93 S.Ct. 201, 34 L.Ed.2d 123; In the Matter of Barbato, 3 Cir. 1970, 421 F.2d 1324, 1327; J......
  • In re Warner
    • United States
    • U.S. Bankruptcy Court — Western District of Tennessee
    • 16 d4 Junho d4 1994
    ...unsupported assertions of an honest intent will not overcome the natural inferences from admitted facts. See, e.g., In the Matter of Moran, 456 F.2d 1030 (3d Cir.1972), cert. denied 409 U.S. 872, 93 S.Ct. 201, 34 L.Ed.2d 123, rehearing denied, 409 U.S. 1050, 93 S.Ct. 534, 34 L.Ed.2d 504 (19......
  • Advanced Res. Solutions, LLC v. McDermott (In re McDermott)
    • United States
    • U.S. Bankruptcy Court — Western District of Oklahoma
    • 25 d3 Julho d3 2018
    ...natural inferences from admitted facts." Liming, 797 F.2d at 897 (quoting 3 Collier ¶ 523.09[5][b], at 523-62; see also In re Moran, 456 F.2d 1030, 1030-31 (3d Cir. 1972), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 872 (1972); In re Monsch, 18 F.Supp. 913, 915 (E.D. Ky. 1937)). However, "[c]arelessness in maki......
  • Matter of Cook
    • United States
    • U.S. Bankruptcy Court — Middle District of Georgia
    • 12 d5 Junho d5 1992
    ...New Jersey, or anyone else. Intent is a state of mind which may be interpreted by the conduct of the person implicated. In re Moran, 456 F.2d 1030, 1031 (3rd Cir.1972). An unconfirmed story about the possibility of a sale does not negate the inference to be drawn from the other actions of t......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT