Incorporated Village of Old Westbury v. Alljay Farms, Inc.

Decision Date05 February 1985
Citation64 N.Y.2d 798,486 N.Y.S.2d 916,476 N.E.2d 315
Parties, 476 N.E.2d 315 INCORPORATED VILLAGE OF OLD WESTBURY, Respondent, v. ALLJAY FARMS, INC., et al., Appellants.
CourtNew York Court of Appeals Court of Appeals
OPINION OF THE COURT MEMORANDUM.

The order of the Appellate Division should be modified, with costs, to declare that defendants have a valid nonconforming use accessory to their single-family dwelling for the maintenance of defendants' own horses, even though they be racing horses, on the property and, as so modified, should be affirmed.

We agree with the Appellate Division, for the reasons stated in its memorandum (100 A.D.2d 574, 473 N.Y.S.2d 505), that defendants do not have a legal nonconforming use for a commercial horse farm, and conclude that defendants have not sustained their heavy burden of demonstrating that the distinction made in the zoning ordinance between farms for the raising of cattle and crops and farms for horse breeding and training is unconstitutional.

On the other hand, the record shows that horses were maintained on the property as an accessory use prior to the enactment of the present ordinance. At the time the ordinance was enacted this was a preexisting use. That use cannot now be expanded to conform with the owner's desire to maintain a commercial breeding farm; however, the maintaining of defendants' horses, even though they be racing horses, on the property cannot be precluded.

WACHTLER, C.J., and JASEN, MEYER, SIMONS, KAYE and ALEXANDER, JJ., concur.

Order modified, with costs to appellants, in accordance with the memorandum herein and, as so modified, affirmed.

To continue reading

Request your trial
19 cases
  •  Subdivisions, Inc. v. Town of Sullivan
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • 23 February 2012
    ...any uses that are not listed” ( Incorporated Vil. of Old Westbury v. Alljay Farms, 100 A.D.2d 574, 575, 473 N.Y.S.2d 505 [1984], mod. 64 N.Y.2d 798, 486 N.Y.S.2d 916, 476 N.E.2d 315 [1985]; see Matter of Moody Hill Farms v. Zoning Bd. of Appeals of Town of N. East, 199 A.D.2d 954, 956, 605 ......
  • Farone v. Town of Saratoga Zoning Bd. of Appeals
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court
    • 11 January 2023
    ...a primary use and an accessory/incidental use]; Incorporated Vil, of Old Westbury v Alljay Farms, 100 A.D.2d 574 [2d Dept 1984], mod 64 N.Y.2d 798 [1985] [same]; see 15 Warren's Weed New York Real Property § 156.10 [Bender 2023]; 12 NY Jur Buildings, Zoning, and Land Controls §§ 282-289 [We......
  • Rembar v. Board of Appeals of the Village of East Hampton
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • 20 March 1989
    ...N.E.2d 651; Incorporated Vil. of Old Westbury v. Alljay Farms, 100 A.D.2d 574, 473 N.Y.S.2d 505, mod. on other grounds, 64 N.Y.2d 798, 486 N.Y.S.2d 916, 476 N.E.2d 315), contrary to the board's contention, this finding does not a fortiori lead to the conclusion that the cottage may be alter......
  • Travelers Ins. Company v. Job
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • 27 May 1997
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT