Independent Bankers Ass'n of Georgia, Inc. v. Dunn, 27611
Decision Date | 05 March 1973 |
Docket Number | No. 27611,27611 |
Citation | 230 Ga. 345,197 S.E.2d 129 |
Parties | INDEPENDENT BANKERS ASSOCIATION OF GEORGIA, INC. v. Edward D. DUNN et al. |
Court | Georgia Supreme Court |
Martin, Snow, Grant & Napier, Charles M. Stapleton, Macon, for appellant.
J. Robin Harris, Decatur, Daniel B. Hodgson, Ronald L. Reid, Ben F. Johnson, III, Alston, Miller & Gaines, Philip H. Alston, Jr., Arthur K. Bolton, Atty. Gen., Harold N. Hill, Jr., Executive Asst. Atty. Gen., Robert J. Castellani, Asst. Atty. Gen., Atlanta, for appellees.
Hansell, Post, Brandon & Dorsey, McChesney H. Jeffries, Atlanta, amicus curiae.
Syllabus Opinion by the Court
This suit seeks to compel the Superintendent of Banks of the State of Georgia (now Commissioner of Banking and Finance (Ga.L.1972, p. 1198)) to institute civil action against the Citizens & Southern National Bank and the Citizens & Southern Holding Company to enjoin them from allegedly violating the provisions of the Banking Law of Georgia which restrict the stock ownership or control of other banks. The suit was brought by the Independent Bankers Association of Georgia, Inc., whose membership is composed of 209 independent banks. Joined as defendants in the instant action are the Citizens & Southern National Bank and the Citizens & Southern Holding Company. Also joined as defendants are the following banks in which it is alleged that the Citizens & Southern National Bank and the Citizens & Southern Holding Company either jointly or separately own or control more than the allowable limit of stock: Citizens & Southern Bank of Thomas County, Citizens & Southern Bank of Milledgeville, Citizens & Southern Bank of Hart County, Citizens & Southern Bank of Dalton, Citizens & Southern Bank of South DeKalb, Citizens & Southern Bank of Cobb County, Citizens & Southern Bank of Tifton, Citizens & Southern Bank of Colquitt County, Citizens & Southern Bank of Jackson, and First State National Bank (Bainbridge).
The evidence shows:
1. The Citizens & Southern National Bank owns all of the capital stock of the Citizens & Southern Holding Company. All officers of the Citizens & Southern Holding Company are paid by the Citizens & Southern National Bank. The Citizens & Southern National Bank lends money to the Citizens & Southern Holding Company without interest. At the time of this hearing the amount was $10,000,000. Mills B. Lane, President of the Citizens & Southern National Bank and President of the Citizens & Southern Holding Company for 25 years and now Vice President of the Board of Directors of Citizens & Southern National Bank testified, 'What is the difference, it is all owned by Citizens & Southern . . . when Citizens & Southern lends $10,000,000 to Citizens & Southern Holding Company, it is lending money to itself . . .'
2. The Citizens & Southern Holding Company owns a 5% stock interest in each of the ten five per cent banks named in the complaint.
3. Counsel for Citizens & Southern stipulated,
4. It was stipulated by counsel that, 'The officers and directors of the Citizens & Southern National Bank who acquired stock in the ten five per cent defendant banks were also shareholders in the Citizens & Southern National Bank.'
5. It was stipulated by counsel that, 'The President of each of the ten five per cent defendant banks was formerly either an officer of the Citizens & Southern National Bank or an officer of another bank in the Citizens & Southern System of banks.' Other than qualifying shares to become a member of the board of directors, each president purchased additional stock, generally about five per cent, which was posted as collateral for loans from the Citizens & Southern National Bank or associate correspondent banks. For the most part these loans were substantial loans on demand notes, the principal of which has not been reduced or substantially reduced. It was also stipulated that each of the ten five per cent defendant banks has one director who is an executive officer of the Citizens & Southern National Bank. Mills B. Lane testified: '
6. The ten five per cent banks participate with the Citizens & Southern National Bank in the following programs: (a) pension plan, (b) employee profit sharing plan, (c) group insurance, (d) educational facilities, (e) recreational facilities, (f) transfer of personnel, (g) trust department and investment counseling, (h) joint printing, and (i) 'anything else that a five per cent bank cannot provide for itself.'
7. The Citizens & Southern Holding Company requires each president of the ten five per cent banks to establish goals and objectives each Fall for the coming year. The performance of each president is evaluated each year and salary increases are recommended based upon this evaluation.
8. In at least some instances the purchase of the stock in the defendant five per cent banks was handled by officers of the Citizens & Southern National Bank and resold to selected individuals. Peyton Anderson, a substantial stockholder of the Citizens & Southern National Bank and a former director of the Citizens & Southern National Bank and the Citizens & Southern Holding Company testified that 2428 shares of stock in the Milledgeville Banking Company once registered in his name were handled as follows:
Mills B. Lane testified in explanation of this arrangement,
Alexander Yearly IV, Chairman of the Board of Directors of Robinson-Humphrey Company which is in the business of buying and selling securities, testified that after July 15, 1969 it purchased 2818 shares of stock of the Milledgeville Banking Company at $230 per share upon the recommendation of Mills B. Lane. Thereafter on July 24, 1969, 500 shares were sold to the Citizens & Southern Holding Company and 2318 to Peyton Anderson. Mr. Yearley stated, ...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
United States v. Citizens and Southern National Bank 8212 1933
...Georgia Banking Commissioner to file suit to force divestiture of excess stock holdings by these shareholders. Independent Bankers Assn. v. Dunn, 230 Ga. 345, 197 S.E.2d 129, modified sub nom. Citizens & Southern National Bank v. Independent Bankers Assn., 231 Ga. 421, 202 S.E.2d 78. The Di......
-
UNITED STATES V. CITIZENS & SOUTHERN NAT'L BANK
...Georgia Banking Commissioner to file suit to force divestiture of excess stock holdings by these shareholders. Independent Bankers Assn. v. Dunn, 230 Ga. 345, 197 S.E.2d 129, modified sub nom. Citizens & Southern National Bank v. Independent Bankers Assn., 231 Ga. 421, 202 S.E.2d 78. The Di......
-
Independent Bankers Ass'n of Georgia v. Bd. of Governors of Federal Reserve System
...F.2d 29 (1974).77 Id. at 38.78 Order of 31 August 1973. R. 431-32.79 Ga.Code Ann. § 13-207(a)(2).80 See Independent Bankers Ass'n of Georgia v. Dunn, 230 Ga. 345, 197 S.E.2d 129 (1973).81 United States v. The Citizens and Southern National Bank, 372 F.Supp. 616 (N.D.Ga.1974).82 R. 430.83 Th......
-
Najran Co. for General Contracting and Trading v. Fleetwood Enterprises, Inc.
...the latter situation is a showing of fraud or injustice required. Neither Farmers Warehouse, supra, not Independent Bankers Assn. of Ga., Inc. v. Dunn, 230 Ga. 345, 197 S.E.2d 129 (1973), supports such an assertion, and any inferences that might creatively be drawn from the vague language o......