Indianapolis St. Ry. Co. v. Darnell
Decision Date | 27 October 1903 |
Citation | 32 Ind.App. 687,68 N.E. 609 |
Parties | INDIANAPOLIS ST. RY. CO. v. DARNELL. |
Court | Indiana Appellate Court |
OPINION TEXT STARTS HERE
Appeal from Circuit Court, Morgan County; M. H. Parks, Judge.
Action by John W. Darnell against the Indianapolis Street Railway Company. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendant appeals. Affirmed.Winter & Winter, Oscar Matthews, and W. H. Latta, for appellant. Elliott, Elliott & Littleton, for appellee.
Appellee brought this action in the superior court of Marion county against appellant for damages caused by appellant running its car against appellee's wagon and injuring his person. It is charged that appellant was negligent in the operation of its car. The trial was had in the circuit court of Morgan county upon a change of venue before a jury, and a verdict returned upon which judgment was rendered in favor of appellee for $6,000. It was charged in the complaint that appellee drove said vehicle upon the street car tracks of the appellant on West Morris street, in the city of Indianapolis, and there stopped and waited for a freight train to cross the street and get out of his way; that “while upon said track *** waiting for said freight train to pass, *** being in said vehicle, *** defendant's car ran against the same.”
Numerous errors are assigned, but in the oral argument counsel for appellant stated that the court would be asked only to pass upon the sufficiency of the evidence to sustain the verdict. Appellant introduced no evidence. At the conclusion of appellee's evidence, appellant moved the court to instruct the jury to find for the defendant. Appellee offered no evidence as to the manner of the accident but his own. His testimony is substantially as follows: Cross-examination: ...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Johnston v. St. Louis & San Francisco Railroad Company
... ... 916; Hicks v. Railroad, 62 ... N.Y.S. 597; Schiner v. Railroad, 90 N.Y. 558; ... Railroad v. Wall, 75 Ga. 282; Railroad v ... Darnell, 68 N.E. 609 (Ind.); Peltz v. Eichele, ... 62 Mo. 171; Blatch v. Archer, 1 Cowper 63 (Lord ... Mansfield). The presumption that deceased did ... ...
-
Chicago & E.I.R. Co. v. Vester
...and only two. *** The other condition, however, is one which relates to this kind of case. *** The case of Indianapolis Street Ry. Co. v. Darnell, 32 Ind. App. 687, 68 N. E. 609, was one of a crossing accident and injury, and the doctrine was there announced that the jury may infer the negl......
-
Johnston v. St. Louis & S. F. R. Co.
...47 App. Div. 479, 62 N. Y. Supp. 597; Schwier v. R. Co., 90 N. Y. 558, 559, 564; Railway Co. v. Wall, 75 Ga. 282; Railway Co. v. Darnell, 32 Ind. App. 687, 68 N. E. 609; Lawson on Presumptive Evidence, 168, But wholly aside from any inference which the jury might have drawn from the fact th......
-
Chicago And Eastern Illinois Railroad Company v. Vester
... ... negligence], and only two. * * * The other condition, ... however, is one which relates to this kind of case. * * * The ... case of Indianapolis St. R. Co. v. Darnell ... (1904), 32 Ind.App. 687, 68 N.E. 609, was one of a crossing ... accident and injury, and the doctrine was there ... ...