Industrial Commission of Colorado v. Ocean Accident & Guarantee Corporation, Ltd.

Decision Date02 June 1919
Docket Number9558.
Citation180 P. 568,67 Colo. 427
PartiesINDUSTRIAL COMMISSION OF COLORADO et al. v. OCEAN ACCIDENT & GUARANTEE CORPORATION, Limited, et al.
CourtColorado Supreme Court

Error to District Court, City and County of Denver; Henry J Hersey, Judge.

Proceeding for compensation under the Workmen's Compensation Act by Leo Hlassar, the employé, against the Union Coal & Coke Company, a corporation, the employer, and the Ocean Accident & Guarantee Corporation, limited, the insurer. Compensation was awarded by the Industrial Commission, which award was reversed by the district court, and the Commission and claimant bring error. Judgment of the district court reversed, with directions to affirm the order of the Commission.

Victor E. Keyes, Atty. Gen., and John S. Fine, Asst. Atty. Gen (Walter E. Schwed, of Denver, of counsel), for plaintiffs in error.

John L Schweigert, of Denver, for plaintiff in error Hlassar.

Charles W. O'Donnell, of Denver, for defendants in error.

DENISON, J.

Sections 53 and 54 of the Workmen's Compensation Act of 1915 (Laws 1915, p. 544) read as follows:

'Sec 53. In case of temporary disability of more than three weeks' duration, the employé shall receive fifty per cent. of his average weekly wages so long as such disability is total, not to exceed a maximum of eight dollars per week and not less than a minimum of five dollars per week, unless the employé's wages shall be less than five dollars per week, in which event he shall receive compensation equal to his average weekly wages.
'Sec. 54. In case of injury resulting in partial disability, the employé shall receive fifty per cent. of the impairment of his earning capacity during the continuance thereof, not to exceed a maximum of eight dollars per week, or a greater sum in the aggregate than two thousand and eighty dollars. * * *'

Leo Hlassar was injured. The respondent insurance company agreed with him to pay him $8 a week during his total disability. They did so to the amount of $728. He then ceased to be totally disabled, but remained under permanent partial disability. The insurance company claimed that the $728 must be deducted from the maxium $2,080. Hlassar claimed that the limited sum, $2,080, was in addition to the $728. The Industrial Commission held with the claimant. The district court reversed the commission, holding that $2,080 was the limit of recovery under both sections.

It is our...

To continue reading

Request your trial
4 cases
  • In re McConnell, 1797
    • United States
    • Wyoming Supreme Court
    • January 24, 1933
    ... ... 661. A contrary result is stated in a Colorado case, ... due to a statute, Ind. Co. v. Guar ... further sum of $ 600 to be paid by the Industrial Accident ... fund. The word "total" appears to ... v. Industrial Commission, ... 57 Utah 208, 193 P. 821. After the ... Ocean etc ... Guarantee Corp., 67 Colo. 427, 180 P ... , the case of Bethlehem Shipbuilding Corporation, ... Ltd. v. Monahan, decided by the United ... ...
  • Marsh v. Aljoe, 1607
    • United States
    • Wyoming Supreme Court
    • January 28, 1930
    ... ... accident, in which case the limitation is extended from ... Industrial Com ... of Colo. v. Johnson, 172 P. 422; 16 ... Industrial Comm. v. Ocean Acc. & Guar. Corp., 67 Colo. 427, ... 180 P ... ...
  • Dickens v. People
    • United States
    • Colorado Supreme Court
    • October 6, 1919
    ... ... PEOPLE. No. 9151. Supreme Court of Colorado, En Banc. October 6, 1919 ... Error ... is no evidence tending to prove the commission of ... the lower offense, that is, where the ... ...
  • Morgan v. J.H. Campbell Const. Co., 40289
    • United States
    • Mississippi Supreme Court
    • November 19, 1956
    ...total disability is distinct from permanent partial disability, even though arising out of the same injury. Industrial Comm. v. Ocean Acc. & Guar. Corp., 67 Colo. 427, 180 P. 568. Others hold the contrary. Georgia Casualty Co. v. Jones, 156 Ga. 664, 119 S.E. 721, and cases cited; Spring Can......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT