Industrial Mercantile Factors Co. v. Daisy Sportswear, Inc.
| Decision Date | 01 March 1968 |
| Citation | 56 Misc.2d 584,289 N.Y.S.2d 332 |
| Parties | INDUSTRIAL MERCANTILE FACTORS CO., Inc., Plaintiff-Respondent, v. DAISY SPORTSWEAR, INC., Defendant-Appellant. |
| Court | New York Supreme Court — Appellate Term |
Jacob M. Nahoum, New York City, for defendant-appellant.
Natanson, Gordon & Reich, New York City (Jay F. Gordon, New York City, of counsel), for plaintiff-respondent.
Before HECHT, J.P., and HOFSTADTER and MARKOWITZ, JJ.
To continue reading
Request your trial
4 cases
-
Ahern v. Scholz
...Mercantile Fac. Co. v. Daisy Sportswear, 56 Misc.2d 104, 288 N.Y.S.2d 209, 211 (N.Y.Civ.Ct.1967), order aff'd, 56 Misc.2d 584, 289 N.Y.S.2d 332 (N.Y.Sup.Ct.1968); see Restatement (Second) of Contracts, § 237 cmt. a (1979). Moreover, Scholz continues, the non-occurrence of a condition of a p......
-
McGill v. Idaho Bank & Trust Co.
...(La.1975); Industrial Mercantile Factors Co. v. Daisy Sportswear, Inc., 56 Misc.2d 104, 288 N.Y.S.2d 209 (1967), aff'd, 56 Misc.2d 584, 289 N.Y.S.2d 332 (Sup.1968); Eastman Oil Well Survey Co. v. Hamil, 416 S.W.2d 597 (Tex.Civ.App.1967). Moreover, as a corollary of this rule of law, it has ......
-
Trolf v. Trolf
...847, 281 N.Y.S.2d 579; Industrial Mercantile Factors Co. v. Daisy Sportswear, Inc., 56 Misc.2d 104, 288 N.Y.S.2d 209, aff'd 56 Misc.2d 584, 289 N.Y.S.2d 332. In view of the foregoing, this court concludes that the plaintiff has failed to prove her cause of action for breach of contract for ......
- People v. Childs