Ingram Contractors, Inc. v. Rowley

Decision Date13 June 1978
Docket NumberNo. 9202,9202
Citation360 So.2d 593
PartiesINGRAM CONTRACTORS, INC. v. H. L. ROWLEY.
CourtCourt of Appeal of Louisiana — District of US

Monroe & Lemann, Benjamin R. Slater, Jr., William J. Hamlin and Benjamin R. Slater, III, New Orleans, for plaintiff-appellant.

Richard S. McBride, Jr., New Orleans, for defendant-appellee.

Before LEMMON, GULOTTA and BOUTALL, JJ.

LEMMON, Judge.

Plaintiff has appealed from a judgment dismissing its suit on a promissory note on an exception to the jurisdiction over the person.

Prior to 1968 H. L. Rowley, maker of the note, was a resident of Louisiana and was president of H. L. Rowley, Inc. (HLR, Inc.), a Louisiana corporation whose entire stock was owned by Rowley, his wife and their child. In August, 1967 HLR, Inc. employed plaintiff, also a Louisiana corporation, to perform dredging services on land in Louisiana leased to HLR, Inc. An invoice for these services was rendered the following month.

HLR, Inc. ultimately went out of business, and in April, 1968 Rowley moved to Mississippi. Because of his personal friendship with the officers of plaintiff corporation, Rowley thereafter agreed to furnish a promissory note making himself personally liable for the corporate debt, and further agreed to pay the interest periodically and to pay the principal as soon as he was financially able to do so. He executed the note in January, 1969, at which time he was still a resident of Mississippi, and mailed the note from Mississippi to plaintiff in Louisiana. He made three interest payments thereafter, the last on January 21, 1971, but was unable to make any further payments.

In the fall of 1970 Rowley moved back to New Orleans "temporarily", then returned to Mississippi until 1975, when he moved to Ohio. This suit was filed in February, 1975, and service by certified mail was obtained in Ohio pursuant to R.S. 13:3201 et seq., the long-arm statute.

R.S. 13:3201 et seq. was designed to allow Louisiana courts the broadest basis for exercising personal jurisdiction over nonresidents which is constitutionally permissible. Adcock v. Surety Research & Inv. Corp., 344 So.2d 969 (La.1977). The applicable standard is that the nonresident must have certain minimum contacts so that a suit against the nonresident does not offend traditional notions of fair play and substantial justice. International Shoe Co. v. Washington, 326 U.S. 310, 66 S.Ct. 154, 90 L.Ed. 95 (1945).

R.S. 13:3201 et seq. authorizes a Louisiana court to...

To continue reading

Request your trial
3 cases
  • Southern Investors II v. Commuter Aircraft Corp.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Middle District of Louisiana
    • August 18, 1981
    ...Farmers Co-op, 386 So.2d 179 (La.App. 3 Cir. 1980); Latham v. Ryan, 373 So.2d 242 (La.App. 3 Cir. 1979); Ingram Contractors, Inc. v. Rowley, 360 So.2d 593 (La.App. 4 Cir. 1978); Mayeux v. Hughes, 333 So.2d 273 (La.App. 1 Cir. 1976); Aucoin v. Hanson, 207 So.2d 834 (La.App. 3 Cir. 1968). The......
  • Sullivan v. Fellows Testagar & Co., Inc.
    • United States
    • Court of Appeal of Louisiana — District of US
    • December 15, 1987
    ...arising from the nonresident's activity or conduct in Louisiana. See: R.S. 13:3202 (Repealed-1987); Ingram Contractors, Inc. v. Rowley, 360 So.2d 593, 594 (La.App. 4th Cir.1978), writ denied, 363 So.2d 72 (La.1978). In this case, the principal demand does not arise from TRI's activity in th......
  • Ingram Contractors v. Rowley
    • United States
    • Louisiana Supreme Court
    • September 29, 1978
    ...In re: Ingram Contractors, Inc., applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit. Parish of Orleans. 360 So.2d 593. Writ ...

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT