Ingwersen v. Edgecombe
Decision Date | 20 November 1894 |
Citation | 60 N.W. 1032,42 Neb. 740 |
Parties | INGWERSEN ET AL. v. EDGECOMBE ET AL. |
Court | Nebraska Supreme Court |
OPINION TEXT STARTS HERE
Syllabus by the Court.
The relation of the directors and managing officers of an insolvent private corporation towards the property and assets thereof, is that of trustees for all of the creditors. Such officers cannot take advantage of their position to secure a preference for themselves, but are required to share ratably with other creditors.
Appeal from district court, Madison county; Allen, Judge.
Action by Ingwersen Bros. against the Farmers' & Drovers' Bank, F. O. Edgecombe, as receiver, and others, to foreclose a mortgage. Judgment for plaintiffs, and defendants appeal. Reversed.Robinson, Reed & Foster, for appellants.
Powers & Hays, for appellees.
On the 22d day of June, 1891, the Farmers' & Drovers' Bank of Battle Creek issued to John F. Teidgen a certificate of deposit in the usual form for $5,000, payable September 1, 1891, and bearing interest at 8 per cent. per annum. On the 9th day of July, following, said Teidgen, as vice president of said bank, for the purpose of securing the said certificate of deposit, executed a mortgage, whereby, in behalf of the bank, he conveyed to himself a lot in the village of Battle Creek, owned and occupied by said bank as a place of business, and in which B. Meyl, the cashier, also joined. On the 15th day of the same month, the said bank was by this court adjudged to be insolvent, and the defendant Edgecombe named as receiver to wind up its business, under the direction of the court. On the 11th day of March, 1892, this proceeding was commenced by the plaintiffs, assignees of Teidgen, in the district court of Madison county, to foreclose the mortgage above mentioned. A decree having been allowed by the district court in accordance with the prayer of the petition, the cause was removed into this court upon the appeal of the receiver.
The numerous propositions discussed by counsel in the briefs submitted are included in the one inquiry, viz. is the mortgage to Teidgen valid as against the receiver of the bank? It should in this connection be noted that the plaintiffs are not shown to be bona fide holders of the certificate of deposit, and do not in fact claim any equities superior to those of their assignor. In addition to the facts above stated, it is disclosed by the record that the bank had been insolvent for some considerable time immediately preceding the date shown by the certificate of deposit, and was at no time thereafter able to pay its creditors in full. The capital stock of the bank was during that time held by R. H. Maxwell, who was president, John F. Teidgen, vice president, Ben Meyl, cashier, and A. H. Hensel, said stockholders all being members of the board of directors thereof. The transactions which resulted in the execution of the mortgage are best understood from the testimony of the parties thereto. For instance, Teidgen, on his direct examination, testified for the plaintiffs as follows: ...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Harle-Haas Drug Company v. Rogers Drug Company
...Ill.App. 313; Shields v. Hobart, 172 Mo. 491; Stratton v. Allen, 16 N. J. Eq., 229; 198 Pa. St., 446; 75 F. 554; 53 Neb. 670; 36 Neb. 548; 42 Neb. 740; 45 Neb. 549; 175 Ill. 89; 130 162; 78 Miss. 179; 74 Miss. 290; 136 U.S. 237.) It is true that many cases hold that an insolvent corporation......
-
City Nat. Bank v. Goshen Woolen Mills Co.
...Smedes & M. Ch. 207, 262, et seq.; Lamb v. Russell (Miss.) 32 South. 916;Tillson v. Downing, 45 Neb. 549, 63 N. W. 836;Ingwerson v. Edgecombe, 42 Neb. 740, 60 N. W. 1032;Stough v. Ponca Mill Co., 54 Neb. 500, 74 N. W. 868;Seeds Dry Plate Co. v. Heyn, etc., Co., 57 Neb. 214, 77 N. W. 660;Rey......
-
T. A. Shaw & Co. v. Robinson & Stokes Co.
...the consideration without offering to make restitution, it may be upheld when assailed even in a court of equity." In Ingwersen v. Edgecombe, 42 Neb. 740, 60 N.W. 1032, there was again involved the right of an officer to secure himself a preference, and POST, J. delivering the opinion of th......
-
City National Bank v. Goshen Woolen Mills Co.
......& M. Ch. 207, 262; Lamb v. Russell (1902), 81 Miss. 382, 32 So. 916; Tillson v. Downing (1895),. 45 Neb. 549, 63 N.W. 836; Ingwersen Bros. v. Edgecombe (1894), 42 Neb. 740, 60 N.W. 1032;. Stough v. Ponca Mill Co. (1898), 54 Neb. 500, 74 N.W. 868; Seeds Dry-Plate Co. v. ......