Insurance Co. of North America v. King
| Decision Date | 05 November 1976 |
| Docket Number | 75--1444 and 75--2076,Nos. 75--1393,INC,LINCOLN-MERCUR,s. 75--1393 |
| Citation | 340 So.2d 1175 |
| Parties | INSURANCE COMPANY OF NORTH AMERICA and Ford Motor Company, a Foreign Corporation, Appellants, v. Gena M. KING et al., Appellees. FORT LAUDERDALE, and Universal Underwriters Insurance Company, Appellants, v. Gena M. KING et al., Appellees. FORT LAUDERDALE, and Universal Underwriters Insurance Company, Appellants, v. Gena M. KING et al., Appellees. |
| Court | Florida District Court of Appeals |
W. M. O'Bryan and Frank E. Maloney, Jr., Fleming, O'Bryan & Fleming, Ft. Lauderdale, and Edward T. O'Donell, Newark, N.J., for Ford Motor Co. and Ins. Co. of North America.
Edna L. Caruso, Howell, Kirby, Montgomery, D'Aiuto & Dean, West Palm Beach, for Fort Lauderdale Lincoln-Mercury, Inc. and Universal Underwriters.
Robert Orseck, Podhurst, Orseck & Parks, and Preddy, Haddad, Kutner, Hardy & Josephs Miami, for appellees Gena M. King and Theodore King.
In this case two appeals from final judgment and one interlocutory appeal, arising out of the same incident, have been consolidated.
The plenary appeals, 75--1393 and 75--1444, are from final judgments against Ford Motor Company and Fort Lauderdale Lincoln-Mercury, Inc., and their respective insurance carriers. We have considered the various points raised by these appeals and find no reversible error. In our opinion there was substantial competent evidence to support the judgments. The other points raised by appellants have been found to be without merit.
We next consider the issue raised by the interlocutory appeal, Case No. 75--2076. Fort Lauderdale Lincoln-Mercury, Inc. filed a cross-claim for indemnification. After entry of judgment in the main suit, pursuant to stipulation, judgment was also entered against Ford Motor Company in favor of Fort Lauderdale Lincoln-Mercury, Inc. for $250,000, the amount of the plaintiffs' judgments. However the trial court denied the request of Fort Lauderdale Lincoln-Mercury, Inc. for indemnification of its court costs and attorney's fees.
It has been established in Florida that generally an indemnitee is entitled to recover, as part of his damages, reasonable attorney's fees, and reasonable and proper legal costs and expenses, which he is compelled to pay as the result of suits by or against him in reference to the matter against which he is indemnified. Fontainebleau Hotel Corp. v. Postol, 142 So.2d 299 (Fla.3d DCA 1962). However, in the present case Ford Motor Company contends that it would be improper to allow the attorney's fees and costs which Fort Lauderdale Lincoln-Mercury, Inc. seeks because the plaintiffs alternatively alleged active negligence against Fort Lauderdale Lincoln-Mercury. Assuming that the initial complaint against Fort Lauderdale Lincoln-Mercury, Inc. was sufficient to allege a cause of action for active negligence, the record is clear that during the trial plaintiffs abandoned any claim that Fort Lauderdale Lincoln-Mercury, Inc. was actively negligent. The judgments against Fort Lauderdale Lincoln-Mercury, Inc. could only have been entered upon the basis of its passive negligence.
Ford Motor Company relies on the case of Florida Power & Light Co. v. Nat Harrison Associates, Inc., 223 So.2d 336 (Fla.3d DCA 1969), to support its contention that an allegation of active negligence is sufficient to bar recovery of expenses incurred...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Hanover Ltd. v. Cessna Aircraft Co.
...developed during the course of litigation and not the mere allegations of the pleadings should control. See Insurance Co. of North Am. v. King, 340 So.2d 1175, 1176 (Fla.Ct.App.1976). [I]t is an indemnitee's actual wrongdoing or lack of it, rather than allegations of wrongdoing, which deter......
-
Maseda v. Honda Motor Co., Ltd.
...not only for the judgment entered against it, but also for attorney's fees and court costs. Insurance Co. of North America v. King, 340 So.2d 1175 (Fla. 4th D.C.A.1976). In this case, the district court found an award of attorney's fees improper because no judgment existed against either th......
-
In re Sunrise Securities Litigation
...v. School Bd. of Seminole County, 778 F.Supp. 518, 521 (M.D.Fla.1991) (applying Florida law); Insurance Co. of North America v. King, 340 So.2d 1175 (Fla.Dist. Ct.App.1976). A party may be entitled to indemnity for attorneys' fees and costs even if it has been exonerated of liability to the......
-
E. C. Ernst, Inc. v. Manhattan Const. Co. of Texas
...so. See, e. g., Bagby v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc., 491 F.2d 192, 198 n. 9 (CA8 1974); Insurance Co. of North America v. King, 340 So.2d 1175 (Fla.D.Ct.App. 1976); cf. 5 A. Corbin, Contracts § 1037, at 225-26 (1964 & Supp.1971). Inclusion of attorney's fees is presumed to ......