Int'l Comm. Young Women's Christian Ass'ns v. Young Women's Christian Ass'n of Chicago

• Decision Date: 18 December 1901
• Citation: 194 Ill. 194,62 N.E. 551
• Parties: INTERNATIONAL COMMITTEE YOUNG WOMEN'S CHRISTIAN ASS'NS v. YOUNG WOMEN'S CHRISTIAN ASS'N OF CHICAGO.
• Court: Illinois Supreme Court

194 Ill. 194

62 N.E. 551

INTERNATIONAL COMMITTEE YOUNG WOMEN'S CHRISTIAN ASS'NS

v.YOUNG WOMEN'S CHRISTIAN ASS'N OF CHICAGO.¹

Supreme Court of Illinois.

Dec. 18, 1901.

Appeal from appellate court, First district.

Action by the Young Women's Christian Association of Chicago against the International Committee Young Women's Christian Associations. From a judgment of the appellate court (86 Ill. App. 607) reversing a judgment in favor of defendant, defendant appeals. Affirmed.

Wilkin, C. J., and Carter, J., dissenting.

Bentley & Burling, for appellant.

Charles E. Pope, for appellee.

HAND, J.

This is a suit for an injunction brought by the appellee in the superior court of Cook county to enjoin the appellant, its agents, etc., from using the name ‘International Committee of the Young Women's Christian Associations,’ or soliciting money or funds under said name, or under any name so similar to the name of appellee, or any colorable imitation thereof, as to deceive and mislead the public into believing that the appellant is the appellee or a committee or representative of the appellee, and from organizing associations under the name ‘The Young Women's Christian Association,’ or any name similar thereto, or any colorable imitation thereof, so as to deceive or mislead the public, etc. A supplemental bill having been filed, a hearing was had upon the original and supplemental bills, the answers and replications thereto, and documentary and oral testimony, and a decree was entered dismissing said suit for want of equity; and, appellee having prosecuted an appeal to the appellate court for the First district, that court reversed the decree and remanded the cause, with directions to the superior court to grant a perpetual injunction against appellant in accordance with the prayer of the original and supplemental bills, to reverse which judgment the appellant has prosecuted an appeal to this court.

It clearly appears from the pleadings and proof that the appellee is one of a large number of associations of women, incorporated and unincorporated, that have existed in this country for many years, who have operated in their respective localities under the name of ‘The Women's Christian Association’ or ‘The Young Women's Christian Association,’ and who have affiliated with each other, since the year 1881 at least, through biennial conferences, known as ‘The International Conference of Women's Christian Associations of the United States and British Provinces,’ which conferences are composed of delegates from ‘The Women's,’ or ‘The Young Women's,’ Christian Associations throughout the countries named, and meet biennially for discussion of plans for the common interest and welfare of the several affiliated associations. No distinction seems to have been drawn between the names ‘Women's' and ‘Young Women's,’ as applied to the various local associations; the object of each being the promotion of the moral, religious, intellectual, and temporal welfare of women,-especially young women who are self-supporting. Appellee first became incorporated in 1877 under the name ‘The Women's Christian Association,’ which name was in 1887 changed to ‘The Young Women's Christian Association of Chicago.’ In effectuation of its purposes it maintains two boarding houses, a free medical dispensary, library, employment bureau, etc., and is enabled to do so by the aid of contributions of money and other valuable articles from its friends. No religious or sectarian test has been required of the voting and managing members of the association, other than that of Christian character, although its managing board has been composed of women from nearly all of the Evangelical churches of Chicago; neither has such a test been applied as a prerequisite to representation in the biennial international conferences, but at some one or more of these conferences the question of applying the so-called ‘Evangelical test’ was more or less urged and discussed informally. The mooted question thus discussed was whether or not the conference should adopt a resolution that in the future no association should be permitted representation in the conference unless its separate constitution should contain a provision making a prerequisite to voting and officeholding membership therein that they should be members in good standing of Evangelical churches. Through the influence of some of the leading members of the conference the proposed resolution was never acted upon by the conference, but was kept out of that body. The result was that steps were taken by at least some of those who favored such a test to organize a central association of women, to which no member of any association should be admitted unless its voting and officeholding membership should be limited to women who were members of churches subscribing to the ‘Evangelical test.’ The first convention of these latter persons was held in 1886, at Lake Geneva, Wis.; and at that time a national committee was elected, which on October 9, 1891, became incorporated in this state as ‘International Committee of the Young Women's Christian Associations,’ the appellant here. The objects of appellant, as set forth in its charter, are ‘the organization and development of Young Women's Christian Associations for the promotion of the physical, social, intellectual, and spiritual education of women,’ and its management is vested in a board known and described as ‘The International Committee.’ Since its organization and incorporation, local associations said to number over 300 have come under its management and control, two local associations having been organized in Chicago; the previously chosen field of appellee, under the names, respectively, of ‘The North Chicago Young Women's Christian Association,’ and ‘The West Chicago Young Women's Christian Association,’ and in furtherance of that work the appellant has issued and circulated through the mails a publication known as ‘The Young Women's Christian Association Quarterly,’ which was latterly succeeded by ‘The Young Women's Christian Association Evangel.’ Much confusion has arisen on account of the similarity in name of the appellant and appellee. Letters intended for the one have been delivered to the other, visitors intending to call upon the one have called upon the other, and donations intended for the one have been received by the other. It is apparent the motive for the creation of the International Committee was brought about by the failure of the International Conference to adopt the resolution requiring the ‘Evangelical test.’ That those persons who favored the adoption of such a resolution had a right to withdraw from the International Conference when convinced that their views were not agreeable to the majority of the conference, and to call a convention of those who were favorable to their views, and to select a committee or board of managers to have general supervision over the work of the associations comprising that convention, is not denied, and must be conceded by all. The question here, however, to be decided is, had such persons, upon their withdrawal and reorganization, a right to adopt as a name for its managing board ‘International Committee of the Young Women's Christian Associations,’-a name which contains substantially the entire corporate name of appellee, a previously incorporated association, preceded by the words ‘International Committee of,’ which clearly indicate to the ordinary mind that appellant is a committee of appellee and the conference with which appellee is affiliated, and with which appellant has no connection, and to use that name in the conduct of its affairs? We think not. The object, work, sources of support, and field of labor of each being substantially the same, and the name of appellee having been adopted and in use by it many years prior to the incorporation of the appellant, the appellant had no right to adopt as its corporate name one so similar to that of appellee, or to incorporate in its name words which would indicate to the public that it was the representative of appellee and the conference with which appellee is affiliated. In addition to the similarity of name, and the representation contained in appellant's name that appellant is the representative of appellee and the conference with which it is affiliated, from an examination of the entire record it clearly appears that such name was adopted by the appellant advisedly and for the purpose of leading the general public, and the persons with whom it was likely to be associated, and from whom it hoped and expected to obtain support by way of donations, to believe that it stood as the committee and representative of the associations known as ‘The Young Women's Christian Association,’ then organized in the field where it expected to operate. Appellant may have felt justified in so doing by reason of the failure of the International Conference to adopt the ‘Evangelical test,’ yet such conduct, in law, amounts to a fraud upon the public and appellee. While it is true that generic terms or mere descriptive words are the common property of the public, and not ordinarily susceptible of...