International Brotherhood, Etc. v. Huval
Decision Date | 14 October 1942 |
Docket Number | No. 7931.,7931. |
Citation | 166 S.W.2d 107 |
Parties | INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF BOILER MAKERS, IRON SHIPBUILDERS AND HELPERS OF AMERICA et al. v. HUVAL. |
Court | Texas Supreme Court |
Dan Moody, of Austin, amicus curiae.
This suit was brought by J. R. Huval against International Brotherhood of Boilermakers Iron Shipbuilders & Helpers of America and the American National Insurance Company to recover disability benefits alleged to be due under a contract of insurance. The Court of Civil Appeals affirmed a judgment against both defendants in favor of the plaintiff. 154 S.W.2d 233. For opinions on a former appeal see Tex.Civ. App., 101 S.W.2d 1072 and 133 Tex. 136, 126 S.W.2d 476. The defendants sued out a writ of error to this Court.
The International Brotherhood of Boilermakers, Iron Shipbuilders & Helpers of America, hereinafter referred to as the Brotherhood, is an unincorporated labor organization, with its home office in the State of Kansas, operating as a fraternal benefit society, with local lodges in Texas. The plaintiff, who resided at Port Arthur, Texas, was a member of the Brotherhood. The Brotherhood, as a part of the benefits accruing to its members, agreed through its By-Laws to pay its members certain disability and death benefits under stipulated conditions. In order to provide these benefits the Brotherhood in 1929 entered into a contract with the American National Insurance Company, a Texas life insurance company, with its home office at Galveston, Texas, to insure its members in the payment of the benefits provided for in the By-Laws. This contract of insurance was renewed from year to year, and was in force at the time the loss in question occurred in 1934.
The suit was against both the Brotherhood and the Insurance Company. We will first consider the liability of the Brotherhood. Whatever contract there was between the plaintiff and the Brotherhood for the payment of disability benefits, was created solely by the Constitution and By-Laws of the Brotherhood. The plaintiff introduced proof of the By-Laws of the Brotherhood as they existed in 1925. Under these By-Laws a member was entitled to recover for total disability, if he was totally disabled to the extent that he could not "perform his daily occupation." The plaintiff also introduced evidence to show that he had suffered an enlargement of a pre-existing double hernia, as the result of which he could no longer follow his daily occupation as a boilermaker. On the other hand, the defendant offered to prove that in 1930, long prior to the loss in question, the By-Laws of the Brotherhood had been amended so that in order to authorize recovery for total disability it was necessary for the plaintiff to prove that he was disabled to the extent that he could not follow any gainful occupation. The court refused to allow proof of the By-Laws as so amended. There was evidence that the plaintiff could no longer follow his daily occupation as a boilermaker, but could have followed, and that subsequent to his injury he had actually followed, other gainful occupations. At the time the plaintiff joined the Brotherhood, he expressly agreed to be bound by any subsequent changes that might be made in its By-Laws or rules, and such agreement was binding upon him in this case. 45 C.J. 36. Since whatever rights he had against the Brotherhood were controlled by the By-Laws, said defendant should have been permitted to prove what the provisions of the By-Laws were at the time the injury occurred, and it was error for the trial court to refuse it the right to do so. Because of this error the judgment of the Court of Civil Appeals, affirming the judgment in favor of the plaintiff against the Brotherhood, must be reversed, and the cause remanded to the trial court for a new trial.
It does not follow, however, that the insurance company is not liable. The insurance company entered into a contract with the Brotherhood which was in part as follows:
Said contract provided that the Insurance Company would issue to each member covered by the policy an individual certificate setting forth the protection afforded to him by the Insurance Company. In compliance therewith the Insurance Company issued and delivered to plaintiff an individual certificate, which provided in part as follows:
To continue reading
Request your trial-
State v. State Mut. Life Assur. Co. of America
...State Mutual, and Metropolitan Life Ins. Co. v. Wann, 130 Tex. 400, 109 S.W.2d 470, 115 A.L.R. 1301, International Brotherhood of Boilermakers, etc., v. Huval, 140 Tex. 21, 166 S.W.2d 107, and Watson v. Employers Liability Assur. Corp., 348 U.S. 66, 75 S.Ct. 166, 99 L.Ed. 74, cited by the S......
-
State Mut. Life Assur. Co. of America v. State
...Supreme Court in Great Southern, supra, and in International Brotherhood of Boilermakers, Iron Shipbuilders, and Helpers of America v. Huval, 140 Tex. 21, 166 S.W.2d 107, 112. A more able opinion or sound decision than the one written by now Chief Justice Calvert for the Court in Great Sout......
-
Texas Employers Ins. Ass'n v. Crow
...of Boilermakers, Iron Shipbuilders & Helpers of America, v. Huval, Tex.Civ.App., 154 S.W.2d 233, 235, reversed on other grounds, 140 Tex. 21, 166 S.W.2d 107; Traders & General Ins. Co. v. Wright, Tex.Civ.App., 95 S.W.2d 753, 758, affirmed 132 Tex. 172, 123 S.W.2d 314; Texas Indemnity Ins. C......
-
Washington Nat. Ins. Co. v. Shaw
...Metropolitan Life Ins. Co. v. Wann, 130 Tex. 400, 109 S.W.2d 470, 115 A.L.R. 1301; International Brotherhood of Boiler Makers, Iron Shipbuilders, and Helpers of America v. Huval, 140 Tex. 21, 166 S.W.2d 107; Boseman v. Connecticut General Life Ins. Co., 301 U.S. 196, 57 S.Ct. 686, 81 L.Ed. ......
-
Texas Register, Volume 48, Number 27, July 7, 2023
...to group poli- cies contracted by entities outside of Texas. See Int'l Bhd. of Boilermakers, Iron Shipbuilders & Helpers of Am. v. Huval, 166 S.W.2d 107 (Tex. 1942)...("Very clearly, the contract {for ity and death benefits} entered into by the Insurance Company {with the association} was a......