International Oil Field Supply Services Corp. v. Fadeyi

Decision Date05 December 2006
Docket Number2005-06410.
Citation35 A.D.3d 372,825 N.Y.S.2d 730,2006 NY Slip Op 09173
PartiesINTERNATIONAL OIL FIELD SUPPLY SERVICES CORP., Appellant, v. FESTUS ALANI FADEYI et al., Respondents, et al., Defendants.
CourtNew York Supreme Court — Appellate Division

Ordered that the order is modified, on the law, by deleting the provisions thereof granting that branch of the motion of the defendant Festus Alani Fadeyi which was to dismiss the first cause of action and granting that branch of the separate motion of the defendant Jason Fadeyi which was to dismiss the fifth cause of action and substituting therefor provisions denying those branches of the separate motions; as so modified, the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements.

The plaintiff's allegations, liberally construed, may broadly be summarized as follows. Over a period of more than 10 years, the plaintiff International Oil Field Supply Services Corp. (hereinafter IOFS) and its principals, Kevin Murtha and Albert Longoria, formed close business and personal ties with the individual defendants Festus Alani Fadeyi (hereinafter Festus) and his son, Jason Fadeyi (hereinafter Jason), as well as with the corporate defendant Pan Ocean Oil Corporation, Nigeria (hereinafter Pan Ocean), which was managed by Festus. Festus and Longoria had known each other since 1987, well before IOFS was formed, and were close personal friends. Among other things, in 1994 IOFS provided the services of one of its petroleum engineers to Pan Ocean, and, in January 2003 IOFS entered into a one-year service agreement with Pan Ocean (hereinafter the Service Agreement).

From approximately 1993 until 2003, IOFS paid Festus sums ranging from $2,000 to $20,000 per month to act as its agent in Nigeria to identify and secure business opportunities and, generally, to provide advice to the company. As of September 30, 2003, Festus allegedly had received a total of $1,337,259 from IOFS.

On or about December 1, 1995, Jason acquired an 80% ownership interest in IOFS following a cash investment of $1,000,000 advanced by Festus. As a result, Jason became IOFS's Vice-President, with managerial control over the company. However, from 1999 until the end of September 2003, at Festus's request, IOFS progressively repurchased Jason's shares for a total consideration of $1,471,402.

Sometime between December 2002 and November 2003, while still purporting to act for IOFS's benefit, Festus allegedly inflated certain projections and analyses prepared by IOFS before submitting them to the Nigerian Government, and forced IOFS to use substandard products and service providers, all for the purpose of making IOFS appear incompetent. Over the same time period, Festus, Jason, and other members of the Fadeyi family formed another company—the defendant CSS Petroleum Services, LLC (hereinafter CSS)—to handle business that should have been referred by Festus and Jason to IOFS. In November 2003 Festus caused Pan Ocean to terminate the Service Agreement and, in January 2004, Pan Ocean replaced IOFS with CSS.

In sum, IOFS claims that it paid a significant amount of money to Festus and Jason over the course of many years, believing all the while that they would act in IOFS's best interests and, through their expertise and contacts, would help the company develop business in Nigeria. Instead, Festus and Jason, while appearing to act for IOFS's...

To continue reading

Request your trial
39 cases
  • Grimes v. Fremont Gen. Corp.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Southern District of New York
    • March 22, 2013
    ...not actionable in fraud because they constitute expressions of future expectations.”); see also Int'l Oil Field Supply Servs. Corp. v. Fadeyi, 35 A.D.3d 372, 825 N.Y.S.2d 730, 734 (App.Div.2006) (“[T]he complaint fails to articulate any specific misrepresentation of a material present fact ......
  • Application Of Olga Kobiashvili v. Jacobi Med. Ctr.
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court
    • December 22, 2009
    ...Signal Corp., 63 A.D.3d 994 (2nd Dept. 2009); Farber v. Breslin, 47 A.D.3d 873 (2nd Dept. 2008); International Oil Field Supply Services Corp. v. Fadeyi, 35 A.D.3d 372 (2nd Dept. 2006); EBC I, Inc. v. Goldman Sachs & Co., 5 N.Y.3d 11 (2nd Dept. 2005). Respondents' motion to dismiss is predi......
  • High Tides Llc v. Demichele
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • October 25, 2011
    ...which amount to no more than “[v]ague expressions of hope and future expectation” ( International Oil Field Supply Servs. Corp. v. Fadeyi, 35 A.D.3d 372, 375, 825 N.Y.S.2d 730), or “mere opinion and puffery” ( DH Cattle Holdings Co. v. Smith, 195 A.D.2d at 208, 607 N.Y.S.2d 227). Such state......
  • Blink v. Johnson
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court
    • August 21, 2015
    ... ... communications, interactive educational services, and ... post-marketing research for the ... Corp., 38 A.D.3d 878 [2d Dept 2007]) ... International Business Machines Corp., 2 A.D.3d 829, 833 ... 2009]; International Oil Field Supply Serv. Corp. v ... Fadeyi, 35 A.D.3d ... ...
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT