Ireland v. State
Decision Date | 17 April 1911 |
Citation | 136 S.W. 947,99 Ark. 32 |
Parties | IRELAND v. STATE |
Court | Arkansas Supreme Court |
[Copyrighted Material Omitted] [Copyrighted Material Omitted]
Appeal from Arkansas Circuit Court; Eugene Lankford, Judge reversed.
STATEMENT BY THE COURT.
The appellant was indicted by the grand jury of Arkansas County and was tried and convicted; the indictment (formal parts omitted) being as follows:
The appellant demurred to the indictment on the following grounds:
First. It is uncertain in the offense charged.
Second. It attempts to charge two offenses.
Third. It does not state facts sufficient to constitute a public offense.
Fourth. It does not describe the property embezzled, nor identify said property, nor allege its ownership.
The demurrer was overruled, and appellant saved his exceptions.
The testimony tended to show that Joseph Ireland was first elected treasurer of Arkansas County in 1904, and after taking the office gave his predecessor a receipt for $ 46,941.92, and that he filed no settlement with the county during said term of office nor at the expiration thereof. That he was re-elected and took the oath and filed his bond November 1, 1906. That the county court made a settlement of his accounts in July, 1908, and the entire record thereof was introduced and read to the jury by the clerk of the county over appellant's objections.
The first order, after specifying the amounts due the different funds and the total amount due the county, concluded: "Whereupon the court called upon the county treasurer to produce all of said funds in order that the court might make actual count of same, which the said treasurer failed and refused to do, stating that he needed time."
The record recited that certain county warrants were tendered for credit on the amount found due by him by the settlement on July 6th and credited same, leaving a balance due the county of $ 7,595.91. The final order of July 30th recited the presentation by J. M. Ireland of two receipts from his successor in office, E. B. Gibson, and the deduction of the amount thereof from the last balance, leaving the balance due the county at this time of $ 5,681.89 and concluded: "Wherefore the court finds that the said J. M. Ireland, as former treasurer, is indebted to the county in the sum of $ 5,681.89, and that he is short in the funds belonging to the county in the said sum of $ 5,681.89, he having failed and refused to produce said sum and to turn same over to his successor in office, and the new treasurer, E. B. Gibson, is hereby directed to collect said sum of $ 5,681.89 from the said defaulting treasurer, J. M. Ireland, and his bondsmen."
Witness then testified that E. B. Gibson took the oath as county treasurer, and read Gibson's bond as such.
C. M. Morgan, the circuit clerk, stated that no appeal was ever taken from the county court's order directing him to pay over to his successor the amount due the county.
Further evidence tended to show that he failed to pay over to his successor, E. B. Gibson, of the amount found due by the settlement, $ 4,423.20. That he had $ 2,900 on deposit to his credit in the Bank of Humphrey, which was lost by its failure; that he resigned his office and turned all his property over to his bonds-men. He carried an account as treasurer in each of the eight or nine banks of the county except one. All the revenue of the county paid him by the collector was paid by checks on banks, and be gave his two checks of a thousand dollars each on this Bank of Humphrey, one in June, 1908, after both he and Ireland had talked with the assistant cashier and been told that the bank was in good condition--better than it had ever been.
A committee investigated his books and accounts at the instance of the county judge, and his bondsmen and its members said: "He helped as much as he could, and seemed to want to discover the truth." "We saw no evidence in his books or papers or vouchers of an attempt to conceal the true state of affairs." Only the account of one bank was investigated by the committee, the failed Bank of Humphrey, and the checks of all the others were checked over to about November 1st, when the committee ceased its investigations, not being able to determine what certain checks were for. They amounted to over six thousand dollars, and were drawn to his own order, and as stated by Mr. Morgan, circuit clerk and member of the committee. He said further: C. T. Frick, cashier of the Home Bank of DeWitt, with which Ireland did most of his business as treasurer, was also on the committee, and said:
J. H. Carnes, a bondsman, testified:
W. R. Garrison testified:
J. W Ireland testified that he made no settlement of his accounts during his first term, not knowing the law and not being required by the county judge, when he went for instructions, to make a settlement. ...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Graham v. State Use Monroe County
...Hunnicutt v. Kirkpatrick, 39 Ark. 172; State v. Wood, 51 Ark. 205, 10 S.W. 624; Wycough v. State, 50 Ark. 102, 6 S.W. 598; Ireland v. State, 99 Ark. 32, 136 S.W. 947. was a sufficient allegation in the amended complaint of a settlement made by the county court with the treasurer, and a fail......
- State v. Perkins
-
Carmen v. State
... ... understand enough about the transaction to know that he was ... charged with being the father of the child, that they should ... not consider it as an admission even, and we do not think any ... error was committed in this respect ... The ... case is unlike that of Ireland v. State, 99 ... Ark. 32, 136 S.W. 947, in which there was a judgment against ... the county treasurer by ... [179 S.W. 185] ... the county court, determining finally the amount he had ... failed to account for and pay over as treasurer, which also ... recited he was short in his accounts ... ...
-
Jobe v. Caldwell
... ... 1. This ... court has twice held that the act of 1903 appropriating $ ... 1,000,000 for the purpose of completing the State capitol was ... not a continuing appropriation but was void after the ... expiration of two years. Art. 5, sec. 28, Const. 1874; 85 ... Ark. 171; ... ...