Irvin v. Edwards

Decision Date14 November 1898
Citation47 S.W. 719
PartiesIRVIN v. EDWARDS, Sheriff.
CourtTexas Supreme Court

Lane & Hicks, for plaintiff in error. C. C. Thomas and C. A. Davies, for defendant in error.

BROWN, J.

W. C. Irvin sold to W. H. Jennings, Jr., all of the beef steers upon the ranch of the former, and executed and delivered to Jennings the following bill of sale: "The State of Texas, County of Bexar. This memorandum of agreement made and entered into on this, the 18th day of September, 1894, by and between W. C. Irvin, of Lasalle county, Texas, party of the first part, and W. H. Jennings, Jr., of San Antonio, Bexar county, Texas, party of the second part, witnesseth: That the said party of the first part has this day bargained and sold, and hereby agrees to bargain, sell, and deliver, unto the party of the second part, all of his steer beeves now located and hereafter to be kept in his pasture in the county of Lasalle and state of Texas, which said steer beeves shall be in number about fifteen hundred (1,500) head, more or less, and all of them shall in the spring of 1895 be 4 years old and upwards. No cattle herein sold shall include any cattle known as `big jaws' or `cripples.' Also, all of his steer cattle which shall be 3 years old in the spring of 1895, and being in number about two hundred (200) head, more or less, all of which shall be good, merchantable steers. Also, all the fat cows, bulls, and stags which the said Irvin can conveniently gather, of such character that they shall be fat and in good shipping condition for beef. All of said cattle being in the following brands: SO side, hip, E U G side, hip, hip, V. K. side. In consideration of the above sale, said W. H. Jennings, Jr., has agreed, and does hereby agree, to pay to said W. C. Irvin for the said 4 year old steers, and older, the sum of eighteen ($18) dollars per head; for the said 3 year old steers, the sum of thirteen ($13) dollars per head; and for the said cows, bulls, and stags, the sum of ten ($10) per head; and has this day paid upon such purchase money, in cash, the sum of six thousand ($6,000) dollars; the balance of said purchase money to be paid when the cattle shall have been delivered. The said W. C. Irvin agrees to pasture and care for all of said cattle from the present time up to the 15th day of June, 1895, and to deliver the same to the said W. H. Jennings, Jr., his heirs or assigns, in train-load lots, in the shipping pens at Cotulla, Texas, if so desired by the said Jennings, upon ten days' notice being given by said Jennings to said Irvin of the time at which said Jennings desires said cattle to be put in the shipping pens by said Irvin, ready for shipment. That, in the application of the payments of said...

To continue reading

Request your trial
11 cases
  • Keller v. State
    • United States
    • Texas Court of Criminal Appeals
    • April 12, 1905
    ...would have been a delivery to the appellee, and the title to the goods would have passed to appellee by such delivery." In Irvin v. Edwards (Tex. Sup.) 47 S. W. 719, there was a contract between Irvin and Jennings by which Irvin contracted to sell Jennings certain cattle. A small portion of......
  • Humble Oil & Refining Co. v. State
    • United States
    • Texas Court of Appeals
    • December 22, 1927
    ...year, although same may be sold shortly thereafter. Carswell & Co. v. Habberzettle, 39 Tex. Civ. App. 493, 87 S. W. 911; Irvin v. Edwards, 92 Tex. 258, 47 S. W. 719; Winters v. Independent School District (Tex. Civ. App.) 208 S. W. Appellant further contends that the valuation of property f......
  • N. K. Fairbank Co. v. Illinois Central Railroad Co.
    • United States
    • Missouri Court of Appeals
    • July 19, 1912
    ...of construction to be determined by the court as a matter of law. Wells v. McNerney, 51 A. 1064; Aultman v. Silha, 85 Wis. 359; Irvin v. Edwards, 92 Tex. 258; 24 Am. & Ency. Law (2 Ed.), 1049. (3) If anything remains to be done in the way of inspection, testing, weighing or the like before ......
  • Gulf, C. & S. F. Ry. Co. v. State
    • United States
    • Texas Court of Appeals
    • March 7, 1903
    ...question until its delivery at Texarkana. It was evidently not so intended in advance of delivery, as held in the case of Irvin v. Edwards (Tex. Sup.) 47 S. W. 719, nor was there an examination and acceptance of the corn in Kansas City, so as to there pass title to the Hardin Grain Company,......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT