Isaac v. State, 2515
| Decision Date | 03 November 1961 |
| Docket Number | No. 2515,2515 |
| Citation | 134 So.2d 38 |
| Parties | Mack Clinton ISAAC, Jr., Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee. |
| Court | Florida District Court of Appeals |
Jack W. Belt, Tampa, for appellant.
Richard W. Ervin, Atty. Gen., Robert R. Crittenden, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.
The appellant (defendant) was charged with the crime of breaking and entering a store house with intent to commit a felony, to-wit: Grand Larceny. After trial, the jury returned a verdict of guilty of breaking and entering a store house with intent to commit a misdemeanor, to-wit: Petty Larceny. The court entered judgment and sentenced him to serve a term of five years in the state prison. The defendant appealed, contending that there was no evidence to establish any breaking on the part of the defendant. For the reasons hereinafter noted, it is unnecessary for us to decide this question.
The crimes set forth in Chapter 810, Florida Statutes, F.S.A., although not all burglary under the common law, have been considered for many years as a species of burglary. State ex rel. Interlandi v. Petteway, 1934, 114 Fla. 850, 155 So. 319.
A charge of breaking and entering with intent to commit a felony necessarily includes as a lesser offense a violation of Section 810.05, Florida Statutes, F.S.A. Jalbert v. State, Fla.1957, 95 So.2d 589.
Section 810.05, Florida Statutes, F.S.A., provides that:
'Whoever breaks and enters or enters without breaking any * * * store house * * * with intent to commit a misdemeanor, shall be punished by imprisonment in the state prison or county jail not exceeding five years, or by fine not exceeding five hundred dollars.'
If breaking and entering with intent to commit a misdemeanor is a different degree of crime or a lesser offense than entering without breaking with intent to commit a misdemeanor, it would then become necessary to determine the sufficiency of the evidence to establish any breaking on the part of the defendant.
The term 'degree of crime' is defined in 22 C.J.S. Criminal Law, § 5, p. 12, as denoting a particular grade of crime more or less culpable than another grade of the same offense. The degrees are distinguished, not by a difference in the particular act performed, but by the circumstances surrounding it or the conditions under which it occurs. The character of the offense is determined by the nature of the punishment; the maximum punishment to which accused is liable to be subjected is the test by which...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Smith v. State
...This is the generally accepted method of distinguishing the greater from the lesser crime in a Carawan situation. In Isaac v. State, 134 So.2d 38, 39 (Fla. 2d DCA 1961), overruled on other grounds, Skov v. State, 292 So.2d 64 (Fla. 2d DCA), cert. denied, 298 So.2d 165 (Fla.1974), the court ......
-
Johnson v. State, s. 65--281
...as a lesser offense a violation of Section 810.05, Florida Statutes, F.S.A. Jalbert v. State, Fla.1957, 95 So.2d 589.' Isaac v. State, Fla.App.1961, 134 So.2d 38, 39. In Blanco v. State, 150 Fla. 98, 7 So.2d 333 (1942), the Supreme Court held that unarmed robbery was included in an informat......
-
Footman v. State, 67--187
...statutes with which we are confronted in this case are: F.S. § 810.02 and § 811.021(2), F.S.A. Thus, based on the case of Isaac v. State, Fla.App.1961, 134 So.2d 38, and the two different chapters of statutes involved, the two counts in the information against appellant represent two separa......
-
Skov v. State, 72--483
...PER CURIAM. In its petition for rehearing, the State, for the first time, calls attention to our previous decision of Isaac v. State Fla.App.2d, 1961, 134 So.2d 38. The rationale of that case appears to conflict at least in part with our opinion. However, it further appears that Isaac is al......