Island House Developers, Inc. v. Amac Const., Inc., 96-1251

Decision Date16 January 1997
Docket NumberNo. 96-1251,96-1251
Citation686 So.2d 1377
Parties22 Fla. L. Weekly D219 ISLAND HOUSE DEVELOPERS, INC., Appellant, v. AMAC CONSTRUCTION, INC., Appellee.
CourtFlorida District Court of Appeals

Brian C. Sanders, Fort Walton Beach, for Appellant.

Douglas J. Centeno, of Schoel, Ogle, Benton and Centeno, Birmingham, AL, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

We discuss only one of the issues raised on appeal: whether the trial court abused its discretion 1 in granting Appellee's motion to compel arbitration, based on Appellant's claim of contract unenforceability pursuant to section 489.128, Florida Statutes. We reverse.

Appellant raised below the issue of contract enforceability in light of the question whether Appellee had a valid general contractor's license. See §§ 489.128, 2 682.02, 682.03, Fla.Stat.; Castro v. Sangles, 637 So.2d 989, 990-91 (Fla. 3d DCA 1994) (holding construction contract unenforceable pursuant to section 489.128 because contractor was unlicensed); Doan v. Amelia Retreat Condominium Assoc., Inc., 604 So.2d 1292, 1293 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992) (trial court's role in considering motion to compel arbitration, inter alia, to determine whether valid written agreement exists containing arbitration clause). However, the trial court declined to make a finding on whether Appellee was validly licensed for section 489.128 purposes. Because the trial court did not make the above finding, the question of contract enforceability was left unresolved, thereby rendering the motion for arbitration prematurely granted. Accordingly, the trial court abused its discretion in granting Appellee's motion to compel arbitration. Thus, the trial court's arbitration order is reversed, and the case is remanded for proceedings consistent with this opinion.

BOOTH, JOANOS and BENTON, JJ., concur.

2 Section 489.128 provides that contracts "performed in full or in part by any contractor who fails to obtain or maintain his license in accordance with this part shall be unenforceable in law or in equity. However, in the event the contractor obtains or reinstates his license, the provisions in this section shall no longer apply."

To continue reading

Request your trial
4 cases
  • RAM OF SO. FL., INC. v. WCI Communities, Inc.
    • United States
    • Court of Appeal of Florida (US)
    • 26 Marzo 2004
    ...the existence of the agreement to arbitrate; only a court can make that determination."); see also Island House Developers, Inc. v. Amac Constr., Inc., 686 So.2d 1377 (Fla. 1st DCA 1997).1 I. A. Facts of the Case On May 10, 2000, WCI and R.A.M. executed a standard form contract for construc......
  • John B. Goodman Limited Partnership v. Thf Const.
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (11th Circuit)
    • 14 Febrero 2003
    ...Inc. v. City of Winter Haven, 800 So.2d 622 (Fla.Dist.Ct.App.2001); Riverwalk, 779 So.2d at 538; Island House Developers, Inc. v. Amac Constr., Inc. 686 So.2d 1377 (Fla.Dist.Ct.App.1997). Unlike Post Tensioned Engineering Corp. and Ronbeck Construction Co., the cases cited by Appellee do no......
  • REWARDS HOTEL MAN. CO., LLC v. ELITE GEN. CONTR., INC., 3D03-1523.
    • United States
    • Court of Appeal of Florida (US)
    • 3 Diciembre 2003
    ...Inc., 779 So.2d 537 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000) (apparently construing Florida Arbitration Code), and Island House Developers, Inc. v. AMAC Constr., Inc., 686 So.2d 1377 (Fla. 1st DCA 1997). ...
  • Poole and Kent Co. v. GUSI ERICKSON CONST. COMPANY, 98-04258.
    • United States
    • Court of Appeal of Florida (US)
    • 29 Septiembre 1999
    ...not compel arbitration prior to determining that the relevant contractor held a valid license. See Island House Developers v. Amac Constr., Inc., 686 So.2d 1377 (Fla. 1st DCA 1997). The legislative history suggests that the statute is intended to address the problems that consumers and the ......
1 books & journal articles
  • The impact of unlicensed contractor activities.
    • United States
    • Florida Bar Journal Vol. 81 No. 11, December 2007
    • 1 Diciembre 2007
    ...2005); Island Club, 864 So. 2d 1191 (Fla. 5th D.C.A. 2004); Rewards Hotel, 860 So. 2d 1011 (Fla. 3d D.C.A. 2003); and Island House, 686 So. 2d 1377 (Fla. 1st D.C.A. (17) Cardegna v. Buckeye Check Cashing, Inc., 894 So. 2d 860 (Fla. 2005), reviewed on remand, 930 So. 2d 610 (Fla. 2005). (18)......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT