Isle of Palms Pest Control Co. v. Monticello Ins. Co., 24388

Citation468 S.E.2d 304,321 S.C. 310
Decision Date18 March 1996
Docket NumberNo. 24388,24388
CourtUnited States State Supreme Court of South Carolina
PartiesISLE OF PALMS PEST CONTROL COMPANY, Respondent, v. MONTICELLO INSURANCE COMPANY, Petitioner.

G. Dana Sinkler, of Warren & Sinkler, Charleston, for petitioner.

Carl H. Jacobson, of Uricchio, Howe, Krell, Jacobson, Toporek and Theos, P.A., Charleston, for respondent.

PER CURIAM:

Petitioner seeks a writ of certiorari to review the decision of the Court of Appeals in this case. Isle of Palms Pest Control Co. v. Monticello Ins. Co., --- S.C. ----, 459 S.E.2d 318 (Ct.App.1994). We grant the writ on petitioner's Question I because it involves a novel question, deny the writ as to the remaining questions, dispense with further briefing, and affirm the decision of the Court of Appeals.

In Question I, petitioner challenges the Court of Appeal's holding that petitioner had a duty to defend and indemnify respondent in a third party action because respondent's failure to discover active termite infestation constituted a negligent inspection, and, therefore, any resulting damage to the home was an occurrence within the scope of the comprehensive general liability policy issued by petitioner. We agree with the reasoning and holding of the Court of Appeals on this issue. Accordingly, the decision of the Court of Appeals is

AFFIRMED.

To continue reading

Request your trial
19 cases
  • Dudek v. Commonwealth Land Title Ins. Co.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — District of South Carolina
    • June 12, 2020
    ...Ins. Co., 319 S.C. 12, 459 S.E.2d 318, 321 (S.C. Ct. App. 1994), writ granted in part on other grounds, decision aff'd, 321 S.C. 310, 468 S.E.2d 304 (1996). Under the doctrine, the "literal interpretation of policy language will be rejected where its application would lead to unreasonable r......
  • Auto-Owners Ins. Co. v. Rhodes
    • United States
    • Court of Appeals of South Carolina
    • August 6, 2009
    ...358 (2002) (citing Isle of Palms Pest Control Co. v. Monticello Ins. Co., 319 S.C. 12, 459 S.E.2d 318 (Ct.App.1994), aff'd, 321 S.C. 310, 468 S.E.2d 304 (1996)). Auto-Owners, meanwhile, contends the circuit court ignored the evidence it presented that the reason Rhodes could not reinstall t......
  • Scottsdale Ins. Co. v. GS Thadius LLC
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — District of South Carolina
    • July 2, 2018
    ...Pest Control Co. v. Monticello Ins. Co. , 319 S.C. 12, 15, 459 S.E.2d 318, 319 (Ct. App. 1994), writ granted in part, decision aff'd, 321 S.C. 310, 468 S.E.2d 304 (1996). The complaint is to be construed liberally, with doubts construed in favor of the insured. Darwin Nat. Assur. Co. v. Mat......
  • Twin City Fire Ins. v. Colonial Life & Acc. Ins.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Middle District of Alabama
    • December 7, 2000
    ...party's complaint." Isle of Palms Pest Control Co. v. Monticello Ins. Co., 319 S.C. 12, 459 S.E.2d 318, 319 (App.1995), aff'd, 321 S.C. 310, 468 S.E.2d 304 (1996). "If the underlying complaint creates a possibility of coverage under an insurance policy, the insurer is obligated to defend." ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT