Isom v. State, SC00-724.

• Decision Date: 12 July 2001
• Docket Number: No. SC00-724.,SC00-724.
• Citation: 790 So.2d 1092
• Parties: Douglas ISOM, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.
• Court: Florida Supreme Court

790 So.2d 1092

Douglas ISOM, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

No. SC00-724.

Supreme Court of Florida.

July 12, 2001.

Mary E. Adkins, Melrose, FL, for Petitioner.

Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Michael J. Neimand, Senior Assistant Attorney General, and Douglas J. Glaid, Assistant Attorney General, Fort Lauderdale, FL, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

We initially accepted review in Isom v. State, 750 So.2d 734 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000), based on an alleged express and direct conflict with the First District's decision in Daniels v. State, 593 So.2d 312 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992). Upon closer examination, however, we find that jurisdiction was improvidently granted in this case. Therefore, we dismiss review of this cause.

It is so ordered.

WELLS, C.J., and SHAW, HARDING, ANSTEAD, PARIENTE, LEWIS, and QUINCE, JJ., concur.