J.C.D., In Interest of, 91-2795
Decision Date | 20 May 1992 |
Docket Number | No. 91-2795,91-2795 |
Citation | 598 So.2d 304 |
Parties | In the Interest of J.C.D., a minor child. 598 So.2d 304, 17 Fla. L. Week. D1284 |
Court | Florida District Court of Appeals |
Richard L. Jorandby, Public Defender, and Louis G. Carres, Asst. Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.
Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Carol Cobourn Asbury, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellee.
We agree with appellant that the evidence was insufficient to sustain a finding of culpable negligence on his part in the tragic death of his young friend. The appellant's version of the tragic incident was corroborated by the testimony of the only other witness to the incident. Their versions of the incident were virtually identical. The proof is uncontradicted that the appellant, and the eyewitness, believed in good faith that the gun involved was unloaded. In addition, appellant's claim that he accidently engaged the trigger of the weapon was not contradicted by any other evidence presented at trial.
This case is tragically similar to a recent case in the Third District where the court held:
Without ... an extensive recitation of the facts surrounding the fatal shooting, suffice it to say that the totality of the evidence in this case establishes that J.A. accidentally shot and killed his friend while carelessly handling a loaded rifle in the deceased's presence. It is clear that the rifle slipped from J.A.'s hands and, as J.A. grabbed for it, he accidentally hit the trigger and tragically shot and killed his friend. At the time, J.A. was not engaged in an argument or physical combat with the deceased or anyone else; there was not the slightest bit of animosity between J.A. and the deceased as, indeed, the two were friends, and J.A. was extremely remorseful after the incident; moreover, J.A. was not under the influence of drugs or alcohol. Under these circumstances, Florida courts have consistently held that such an accidental firearm discharge may be the product of simple or gross negligence by the accused, but cannot rise to the level of culpable negligence so as to constitute a criminal manslaughter. See Dominique [v. State, 435 So.2d 974 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983) ] ( ); Parker v. State, 318 So.2d 502 (Fla. 1st DCA 1975) (, )cert. denied, 330 So.2d 21 (Fla.1976); Getsie v. State, 193 So.2d 679 (Fla. 4th DCA 1966) (, )cert. denied, 201 So.2d 464 (Fla.1967); Sharp v. State, 120 So.2d 206 (Fla. 2d DCA 1960) (...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Sapp v. State
...accident. He relies upon cases reversing a manslaughter conviction where the gun was accidentally discharged. See In the Interest of J.C.D., 598 So.2d 304 (Fla. 4th DCA 1992); J.A. v. State, 593 So.2d 572 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992) (holding that defendant's careless handling of a loaded rifle, resu......
-
Williams v. State Of Fla.
...cases is the defendant's consumption of alcohol at the time of this incident. See Sapp, 913 So.2d at 1226; In the Interest of J.C.D., 598 So.2d 304, 304 (Fla. 4th DCA 1992). A friend of the defendant, who was spending the evening with the defendant and the victim at the defendant's house be......
-
Brinkley v. State
...or that reckless indifference to the rights of others, which is equivalent to an intentional violation of them. In re J.C.D., 598 So.2d 304, 305 (Fla. 4th DCA 1992), quoting Preston v. State 56 So.2d 543, 544 The defense moved to dismiss pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.190(......
-
Hodges v. State, 94-2474
...or that reckless indifference to the rights of others, which is equivalent to an intentional violation of them."In the Interest of J.C.D., 598 So.2d 304, 305 (Fla. 4th DCA 1992) (quoting Preston v. State, 56 So.2d 543, 544 (Fla.1952)); see also Fla.Std.Jury Instr. (Crim.) 69-70.3 In cases w......