J. I. Case Threshing Mach. Co. v. McCoy
Decision Date | 19 June 1916 |
Docket Number | 18268 |
Citation | 72 So. 138,111 Miss. 715 |
Court | Mississippi Supreme Court |
Parties | J. I. CASE THRESHING MACH. CO. v. MCCOY et al |
APPEAL from the circuit court of Scott county, HON. J. A. MCLAURIN Judge.
Suit by J. I. Case Threshing Machine Company against S.D. and Sam C McCoy. From a judgment for defendants, plaintiff appeals.
The facts are fully stated in the opinion of the court.
Judgment reversed.
Cooper & Cooper, for appellant.
Howie & Howie, for appellee.
The appellant, plaintiff in the court below, instituted suit in the circuit court of Scott county against the appellees for the sum of two thousand six hundred and ninety dollars, the purchase price of a gasoline tractor, a hay baler, and a four-bottom gang plow. The indebtedness was evidenced by certain promissory notes given by the appellees to the appellant. Shortly before the time of the signing of the notes a contract of sale was also executed by the appellees. The title to the property was reserved, both in the contract and in the notes, in the vendor, until all of the notes had been paid. The contract of sale contains certain warranties and conditions which are unnecessary to be set out in full. The parts material to this decision are as follows:
The defendants in the court below pleaded a...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
J. A. Fay & Egan Co. v. Louis Cohn & Bros.
... ... 423; Moline Co ... v. Pearce, 52 Neb. 577; J. I. Case Threshing Machine ... Co. v. McCoy et al., 111 Miss. 715, 72 So. 138; ... ...
-
J. C. Boss Engineering Co. v. Gunderson Brick & Tile Co.
...& F. Co., 97 Mich. 166, 56 N. W. 356; Mo. Smoke Preventer Co. v. St. Louis, 205 Mo. 220, 103 S. W. 513; J. I. Case Threshing Machine Co. v. McCoy, 111 Miss. 715, 72 So. 138; Russel et al. v. Murdock et al., 79 Iowa, 101, 44 N. W. 237, 18 Am. St. Rep. 348; Southern Engine & Boiler Works v. G......
-
W. F. Moody & Co., Inc. v. Boyle Gin Co., Inc.
... ... J ... I. Cash Threshing Machine Co. v. McCoy, 111 Miss ... 715, 72 So. 138; McInnis v. Manning, ... Oliphant v. Oliphant, 177 Ark. 613, 7 S.W.2d 783. In ... the Demby Case the court used this language: "A demand ... of payment, in pursuance of ... ...
-
Laurel Auto Supply Co. v. Sumrall
... ... Our court has many times ... J ... I. Case Threshing Machine Co. v. McCoy, 72 So. 138, ... 111 Miss. 715; McInnis v ... ...