J & J Baker Enterprises v. Gaylord

Decision Date09 July 1996
Docket NumberNo. 93-67,93-67
Citation676 So.2d 67
Parties21 Fla. L. Weekly D1605 J & J BAKER ENTERPRISES and Alexsis, Inc., Appellants, v. Brian GAYLORD, Appellee.
CourtFlorida District Court of Appeals

Robert W. Bleakley of Boehm, Brown, Rigdon, Seacrest & Fischer, P.A., Lakeland, for Appellants.

Barry M. Salzman of Chambers, Salzman & Bannon, P.A., St. Petersburg, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

In this workers' compensation case, the employer/carrier (e/c) challenge an order of the Judge of Compensation Claims (JCC) awarding benefits to the claimant. Specifically, the e/c argue that the JCC erred in rejecting their defense which was based upon the intoxication presumption in section 440.09(3), Florida Statutes (1991). 1 We agree with the e/c that the presumption should have been applied, and reverse.

On November 10, 1991, the claimant was injured in a single-vehicle accident when the truck he was driving for the employer overturned. The claimant was taken to the hospital where, approximately two to three hours after the accident, a blood serum test revealed an alcohol content of .201. A test of the claimant's whole blood was not performed.

A claim for benefits was filed, which the e/c defended on grounds that the intoxication presumption in section 440.09(3) precluded compensation.

At a hearing on the claim, the hospital's laboratory director explained that blood alcohol testing was routinely performed on blood serum or plasma, and was not performed on whole blood. According to Dr. Mark Montgomery, a biochemical toxicologist who offered expert testimony, blood serum is the liquid portion of the blood that remains after the red blood cells are removed. Because alcohol distributes in the liquid space, and cells are not completely permeable to water, alcohol testing performed on blood serum will show a higher concentration of alcohol than if the test were performed on whole blood. Dr. Montgomery testified that a serum test result would range from 8 to as much as 17 percent higher than a whole blood result. Using a conservative and accepted reduction factor of 15 percent, Dr. Montgomery concluded that the claimant's serum result of .201 would translate to a whole blood result of .17. Based upon the claimant's testimony as to the time of the accident and the time he stopped drinking, Dr. Montgomery estimated that the claimant had a whole blood level between .19 and .23 at the time of the accident. The calculations necessary to make this estimate did not require any further adjustment for the fact that the...

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT