J. Thompson & Sons Mfg. Co. v. Perkins
Decision Date | 10 April 1896 |
Citation | 66 N.W. 874,97 Iowa 607 |
Parties | THE J. THOMPSON & SONS MANUFACTURING COMPANY, Appellant, v. PERKINS & SON |
Court | Iowa Supreme Court |
Appeal from Story District Court.--HON. B. P. BIRDSALL, Judge.
THE plaintiff is a manufacturing firm, at Beloit, Wis. In November, 1892, the defendant firm, doing business at Ames Iowa gave to one Baldwin, a traveling salesman for plaintiff a written order for agricultural implements, to be shipped to Ames, about February 14, 1893. The amount of the order, after the deduction of the value of one plow, was two hundred and thirty-six dollars and twenty-five cents. The written order contained numerous conditions, and was signed "Perkins & Son." After the signature is the following "Accepted subject to approval of J. Thompson & Sons Mfg Co. F. R. Baldwin, Salesman." About the first of February, 1893, the defendants countermanded the order, by letter, which the plaintiff disregarded, and it shipped the goods, which defendants refused to receive, and this action is to recover the purchase price. Defendants claim the right to countermand the order, because the contract had never been completed, by an acceptance of the order. The petition recites the facts, as to the giving of the order, the shipment of the implements, and other facts, and the following are the facts pleaded to show an acceptance. . " To the petition the defendants demurred, on several grounds, and among them, the failure of acceptance, which demurrer the court sustained, and, plaintiff electing to stand on the petition, judgment was entered against it for costs, and it appealed.
Affirmed.
Jordan & Brocket for appellant.
Dyer & Stevens for appellees.
I.
From appellant's argument it appears that the court below, in ruling on the demurrer, took the view that the only acts of approval of the order pleaded...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
J. Thompson & Sons Manuf'g Co. v. Perkins
... ... The amount of the order, after the deduction of the value of one plow, was $236.25. The written order contained numerous conditions, and was signed Perkins & Son. After the signature is the following: Accepted subject to approval of J. Thompsons & Sons Mfg. Co. F. R. Baldwin, Salesman. About the 1st of February, 1893, the defendants countermanded the order by letter, which the plaintiff disregarded, and shipped the goods, which defendants refused to receive, and this action is to recover the purchase price. Defendants claim the right to countermand ... ...