JA v. State, 2D97-1551.
| Citation | 779 So.2d 390 |
| Decision Date | 23 June 2000 |
| Docket Number | No. 2D97-1551.,2D97-1551. |
| Parties | J.A., a child, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee. |
| Court | Florida District Court of Appeals |
Terri L. Backhus, Tampa, for Appellant.
Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Michael J. Neimand, Assistant Attorney General, Ft. Lauderdale, for Appellee.
James D. Palermo, City Attorney, and Jerry M. Gewirtz, Assistant City Attorney, Tampa, for Amicus Curiae City of Tampa.
J.A. appeals the trial court's adjudications of delinquency for grand theft and for violating Tampa's juvenile curfew ordinance. See Tampa, Fla., Code § 14-26(c) (1996). We affirm the adjudication of delinquency for grand theft without discussion. We reject J.A.'s contention that the ordinance is unconstitutional and affirm under the authority of J.P. v. State, 775 So.2d 324 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000), and State v. T.M., 761 So.2d 1140 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000).
We again certify the following questions of great public importance:
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
JA v. State, 2D97-1551.
...previously rejected his argument and affirmed the trial court's determination that the ordinance was constitutional. See J.A. v. State, 779 So.2d 390 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000), quashed 788 So.2d 953 (Fla.2001). In affirming the trial court, this court applied the heightened scrutiny test. See Stat......
-
JA v. State
...Jerry M. Gewirtz, Assistant City Attorney, Tampa, FL, for City of Tampa, Amicus Curiae. PER CURIAM. We have for review J.A. v. State, 779 So.2d 390 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000), in which the Second District Court of Appeal certified the following questions to be of great public WHAT LEVEL OF SCRUTINY......
- Williams v. State, 2D98-3654.