Jackson v. Asselta
| Decision Date | 04 February 1964 |
| Docket Number | No. 63-374,63-374 |
| Citation | 160 So.2d 167 |
| Parties | Emile JACKSON and Albert Jackson, her husband, Appellants, v. Joseph ASSELTA, Appellee. |
| Court | Florida District Court of Appeals |
Fuller & Brumer, Kenneth L. Ryskamp, Miami, for appellants.
Smith & Poole and James J. Kenny, Miami, for appellee.
Before BARKDULL, C. J., and TILLMAN PEARSON and HENDRY, JJ.
The plaintiffs appealed a summary final judgment for defendant. Their complaint alleged the plaintiff-wife was the guest of a tenant and their action was against the landlord. The summary judgment was properly entered under the rule stated in McNulty v. Hurley, Fla.1957, 97 So.2d 185, 187; Tomei v. Center, Fla.App.1959, 116 So.2d 251.
Affirmed.
To continue reading
Request your trial
2 cases
-
Wood v. Camp
...between them. Tomei v. Center, 116 So.2d 251 (Fla.App.2d 1959); Roth v. Flom, 105 So.2d 179 (Fla.App.3d 1958); and Jackson v. Asselta, 160 So.2d 167 (Fla.App.3d 1964). These are areas requiring We resolve our dilemma in a troublesome area by concluding, and we so hold, that the class of inv......
- Vespi v. Driggers, 93-00875