Jackson v. Beatty
Citation | 57 S.W. 799 |
Parties | JACKSON, Collector, v. BEATTY. |
Decision Date | 09 June 1900 |
Court | Supreme Court of Arkansas |
Appeal from circuit court, Carroll county, James M. Pittman, Judge.
Action by W. E. Beatty against J. H. Jackson, as collector of Carroll county, for a writ of mandamus to compel defendant to accept for county taxes a county warrant issued by the county court of Carroll county. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendant appeals. Affirmed.
Beatty sought by mandamus to compel Jackson, collector of Carroll county, to accept for county taxes the county warrant No. 267 for $75.35, issued by the county court of Carroll county in 1884. Jackson admitted that the taxes tendered by Beatty were correct; that he was collector; that Beatty offered to pay him his county tax with warrant no No. 267, and to remit the excess of the warrant above his taxes; that the warrant was legally issued to pay a debt allowed by the county court against the county; and he alleged that he refused to accept the warrant in payment of taxes by Beatty for the reason that on the 10th day of April, 1890, the county court of Carroll county, being in regular session, had made an order calling in for reissue and cancellation all the warrants outstanding, and that the holder of this warrant had failed to present the same for cancellation and reissue, and that same was, therefore, barred. The order of the county court was as follows:
A copy of this order was attached to the sheriff's return, which is as follows:
Editors' affidavits of publication:
To continue reading
Request your trial- Jackson v. Beatty
-
Connerly v. Stephenson
...the legislative will. And publication in a newspaper published in another town did not meet the requirements of the law. Jackson v. Beatty, 68 Ark. 273, 57 S. W. 799." So, here, the people, in adopting the amendment designated as No. 16, may have thought it unwise to confer the authority to......