Jackson v. Martin, GC6634.
Decision Date | 19 December 1966 |
Docket Number | No. GC6634.,GC6634. |
Parties | Paul George JACKSON, Jr., Plaintiff, v. Willie MARTIN, Jr., individually and as police officer of the City of Ruleville, Mississippi, Defendant. |
Court | U.S. District Court — Northern District of Mississippi |
Carsie A. Hall, Jack H. Young, R. Jess Brown, Richard E. Tuttle, John H. Doyle, III, Jackson, Miss., for plaintiff.
James E. Welch and Townsend, Welch & Terney, Drew, Miss., for defendant.
Plaintiff's complaint seeks a judgment for money damages against defendant and is bottomed on Title 42, United States Code, § 1983. Defendant's motion to dismiss the complaint is before the court on briefs of the parties and other materials furnished. The principal ground of the motion is that the complaint fails to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. The thrust of defendant's argument is that the complaint contains mere unsupported conclusory allegations and does not contain a highly specific statement of facts, alleging denial under color of state law of federal rights, privileges, and immunities, with the purpose of discriminating against a particular person or persons or a particular class of persons. To deal with this contention, it is not necessary to go beyond the cases decided in this circuit. See Jackson v. Duke, 259 F.2d 3 (5th Cir. 1958); Brazier v. Cherry, 293 F.2d 401 (5th Cir. 1961) and Hughes v. Noble, 295 F.2d 495 (5th Cir. 1961).
In Jackson, a complaint which alleged that defendants, acting in their official capacity as police officers and under color of law, brutally assaulted plaintiff without provocation, was held to state a cause of action under § 1983.1 In Brazier, it was held that plaintiff had a federally enforceable claim for damages for the wrongful death of her husband resulting from beatings inflicted by county and municipal law enforcement officers after an illegal arrest. Hughes held that allegations that the plaintiff was jailed "without any just cause or provocation" for thirteen hours, was not allowed to call anyone to attend to his injuries, which were diagnosed as two dislocated and one fractured cervical vertebra, stated a cause of action for deprivation of civil rights within the meaning of § 1983.
The complaint here in substance alleges that defendant was a municipal policeman charged with the duty of enforcing the laws of the state and the ordinances of the City of Ruleville and that while plaintiff was standing on a sidewalk in front of a public cafe in said municipality, the defendant These allegations, under the criteria established in this circuit by the cited cases, sufficiently state a cause of action under § 1983. But, see also, Hardwick v. Hurley, 289 F.2d 529 (7th Cir. 1961); Cohen v. Norris, 300 F.2d 24 (9th Cir. 1962) and Basista v. Weir, 340 F.2d 74 (3rd Cir. 1965). The cases cited by defendant are all distinguished on their facts and are inapposite here.
Defendant's motion also assigns as one of its grounds for dismissal that the complaint fails to allege defendant's place of residence or domicile, that it fails to allege any diversity of citizenship, and thus fails to confer jurisdiction on this court. Since the filing of defendant's motion to dismiss, however, plaintiff filed an amended complaint which has cured this omission by alleging that defendant is a resident of Sunflower County in the State of Mississippi. Rule 15, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. And, diversity of citizenship is not necessary in a case bottomed on § 1983. Title 28 U.S.C. § 1343.
Also assigned is the fact that the defendant is identified in the summons as being employed by the Police Department of Greenville, Mississippi, while the complaint refers to him as being employed by the Police Department of Ruleville, Mississippi. This is not argued in defendant's brief, and thus would be treated as abandoned except for the fact that plaintiff, in his brief, has moved to amend. Rule 4(h), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. In this area, both parties are shadowboxing. It is not necessary for any action to be taken by this...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Green v. Cauthen
...to be free from unnecessary force while being legally arrested, Morgan v. Labiak, 368 F.2d 338 (10th Cir. 1966) and Jackson v. Martin, 261 F.Supp. 902 (N.D. Miss.1966), and can maintain a § 1983 action on an allegation of unreasonable or unnecessary force in the effectuation of a legal D. P......
-
United States v. Bernett
... ... of resolving for itself the issue of voluntariness, the court followed the procedure in Jackson v. Denno 67 and remanded the case to the state courts for such a determination. 68 ... ...
-
Soto v. City of Sacramento
...243, 7 L.Ed.2d 136 (1961); Jackson v. Duke, 259 F.2d 3 (5th Cir. 1958); Brooks v. Moss, 242 F.Supp. 531 (W.D.S.C.1965); Jackson v. Martin, 261 F.Supp. 902 (N.D.Miss.1966). (Emphasis in original). I, likewise, hold that the use of unreasonable force, that is, force unnecessary to the pursuit......
-
Roberts v. Williams, GC 6635-K.
...jurisdiction is unaffected, for diversity of citizenship is not a jurisdictional requisite in Section 1983 actions. Jackson v. Martin, 261 F.Supp. 902 (N.D.Miss. 1966); see also Walton v. City of Atlanta, 181 F.2d 693 (5 Cir. 1950), cert. den. 340 U.S. 823, 71 S.Ct. 56, 95 L.Ed. 604; 28 U.S......