Jackson v. State
Decision Date | 25 April 2003 |
Citation | 886 So.2d 153 |
Parties | Hayden Jerome JACKSON v. STATE of Alabama. |
Court | Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals |
Glenn L. Davidson, Mobile, for appellant.
William H. Pryor, Jr., atty. gen., and J. Thomas Leverette, asst. atty. gen., for appellee. BASCHAB, Judge.
AFFIRMED BY UNPUBLISHED MEMORANDUM.
I must respectfully dissent from the majority's unpublished memorandum affirming Hayden Jerome Jackson's conviction for first-degree unlawful possession of marijuana. The majority has held that, under the facts of this case, the search and seizure initiated at the safety checkpoint roadblock was valid and constitutional.
From the law quoted by the majority, it is clear that the United States Supreme Court has held that roadblocks, otherwise considered an invalid, warrantless search and seizure, are reasonable in two instances in which the governmental interest has been proven to be distinct from general law enforcement purposes — border patrol to control the problem posed by the unchecked flow of illegal immigrants into this country and sobriety checkpoints to control the widespread problem of drunk driving in this country. See United States v. Martinez-Fuerte, 428 U.S. 543, 96 S.Ct. 3074, 49 L.Ed.2d 1116 (1976), and Michigan Dep't of State Police v. Sitz, 496 U.S. 444, 110 S.Ct. 2481, 110 L.Ed.2d 412 (1990). Neither the courts of this State, nor the United States Supreme Court, have ever upheld the constitutionality of a search resulting from a roadblock set up for general law enforcement purposes, as such general purposes do not outweigh the liberty interests of those people forced to endure the search.
In this case, the roadblock was set up as part and parcel of a contract between the Mobile Housing Authority and the police department in an attempt to control crime in the housing project in question. An officer claimed that he smelled marijuana during the stop of Jackson's vehicle, and he made Jackson pull his vehicle to the side of the road. The subsequent warrantless search yielded marijuana. During the suppression hearing, the following relevant pieces of testimony were elicited from Sgt. Frank Cassidy, who was supervising the six-man unit that set up the roadblock:
(R. 12-14.)
...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Ex parte Jackson
...et seq., Ala.Code 1975. The Court of Criminal Appeals affirmed Jackson's conviction and sentence without an opinion. Jackson v. State, 886 So.2d 153 (Ala.Crim.App.2003). Jackson petitioned this Court for certiorari review. We granted the petition to review whether the roadblock-type stop co......