Jackson v. State, 91-1061

Decision Date11 March 1992
Docket NumberNo. 91-1061,91-1061
Citation596 So.2d 113
PartiesXavier Smith JACKSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee. 596 So.2d 113, 17 Fla. L. Week. D725
CourtFlorida District Court of Appeals

Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender, and Nada M. Carey, Asst. Public Defender, Tallahassee, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., and Sara D. Baggett, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The appellant appeals from his judgment of conviction and sentence for possession of cocaine seized after a police officer stopped an automobile the appellant was driving. Because we agree with the appellant's argument that the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress the cocaine, we reverse the conviction and sentence.

The only justification offered by the prosecution for the stop of the appellant's automobile was the officer's observation of a minor traffic infraction, a non-functioning tail light. When the prosecution relies solely upon a minor traffic violation as justification for the stop of an automobile, it has the burden of showing that a reasonable officer would have stopped the vehicle under such circumstances. Kehoe v. State, 521 So.2d 1094 (Fla.1988). Our review of the evidence presented below reveals no factual basis for the trial court to have found that the prosecution met this burden. In the absence of such evidence, the motion to suppress should have been granted.

The judgment of conviction and sentence are reversed and the cause is remanded. Because the granting of the motion to suppress is dispositive of the cause, we direct that the trial court discharge the appellant.

SMITH, ZEHMER and ALLEN, JJ., concur.

To continue reading

Request your trial
2 cases
  • Daniel v. State, 92-3005
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • September 8, 1994
    ...the trial court's ruling. Owen v. State, 560 So.2d 207 (Fla.1990). Nevertheless, reversal is required in this case. In Jackson v. State, 596 So.2d 113 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992), this court held, on the authority of Kehoe v. State, 521 So.2d 1094 (Fla.1988), [w]hen the prosecution relies solely up......
  • Davis v. State, 91-01455
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • September 23, 1992
    ...it has the burden of showing that a reasonable officer would have stopped the vehicle under the circumstances. Jackson v. State, 596 So.2d 113 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992). Our review of the record reveals that the state failed to offer evidence to sustain its burden. The trial court erred in denyin......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT