Jackson v. State, 2D13–2252.
| Decision Date | 08 August 2014 |
| Docket Number | No. 2D13–2252.,2D13–2252. |
| Citation | 144 So.3d 658 |
| Parties | Reginald Montre JACKSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee. |
| Court | Florida District Court of Appeals |
OPINION TEXT STARTS HERE
Howard L. Dimmig, II, Public Defender, and Megan Olson, Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant.
Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Marilyn Muir Beccue, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.
Reginald Jackson appeals from his judgments and sentences for grand theft and criminal mischief. He argues that the trial court abused its discretion in summarily denying his motion for a reduction or modification of his sentences for grand theft without holding a hearing to allow Jackson to present evidence that his absence from the sentencing hearing was involuntary. 1 We agree and reverse.
Jackson entered open guilty pleas to charges filed in two cases with the understanding that he would be placed on concurrent two-year terms of community control followed by two years of probation. The judge accepted Jackson's guilty pleas and delayed sentencing on the condition that Jackson refrain from committing any new offenses and that he appear for sentencing at 8:30 a.m. on the designated day. Jackson was warned that if he failed to appear he could be sentenced to as much as ten years in prison. When Jackson did not appear at the scheduled time, the judge sentenced Jackson in his absence to two years in prison followed by three years of probation in each case. Within an hour of the sentences being imposed, Jackson called the judge's chambers to report that he had failed to appear because of a medical emergency. Jackson also filed a motion for modification of sentence under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(c) and attached a document evidencing his presence at a hospital on the date of sentencing. The judge denied the motion without a hearing.
As Jackson argues on appeal, a defendant has a right to be present at all critical stages of his trial and cannot be sentenced in absentia for a felony unless he voluntarily waived his presence at the hearing. See Miller v. State, 833 So.2d 318, 319 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003); Singletary v. State, 870 So.2d 851, 852 (Fla. 3d DCA 2003). The burden is on the defendant, after his apprehension or appearance, to establish that his failure to appear was not voluntary. Wallen v. State, 932 So.2d 493, 493 (Fla. 4th DCA 2006).
Jackson attached documentation to his motion to modify or reduce sentence to support his allegation that his absence was not voluntary, but the judge summarily denied his motion without giving Jackson the opportunity to present his evidence. This was error. See Blair v. State, 25 So.3d 46, 48 (Fla. 5th DCA 2009) (); Zuluaga v. State, 793 So.2d 60, 61 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001) (...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Reynolds v. State
...that the defendant did not prove his absence was voluntary, of which he bore the burden. Id. Similarly, the court in Jackson v. State , 144 So. 3d 658 (Fla. 2d DCA 2014) applied Wallen to require the defendant to prove that his absence from sentencing was involuntary . Id. at 659. The court......
-
Hilliard v. State, 2D13–5910.
...in summarily denying a motion following sentencing that challenged whether his absence was voluntary. As we did in Jackson v. State, 144 So.3d 658 (Fla. 2d DCA 2014), we remand this case for an evidentiary hearing on the motion to determine the factual issue of whether his absence from both......
- Smalls v. State, 2D12–6079.