Jackson v. State, 58978

Decision Date22 February 1980
Docket NumberNo. 58978,58978
Citation153 Ga.App. 584,266 S.E.2d 273
CourtGeorgia Court of Appeals
PartiesJACKSON v. The STATE.

Barry R. Chapman, Valdosta, for appellant.

H. Lamar Cole, Dist. Atty., Richard W. Shelton, Asst. Dist. Atty., for appellee.

SMITH, Judge.

Appellant was indicted for aggravated battery and convicted of aggravated assault. Appellant makes two contentions on appeal: (1) that the trial court erred in refusing to grant appellant's motion for directed verdict of acquittal on the aggravated battery charge and (2) that the indictment cannot support a conviction for aggravated assault. We affirm.

1. The indictment alleges that appellant "did . . . maliciously cause bodily harm to Nellie Taylor Rickman, by rendering her left ear useless and by seriously disfiguring her body by shooting her with a certain pistol." Appellant contends that the state failed to prove that the victim's ear was rendered "useless." Therefore appellant argues, a directed verdict of acquittal should have been granted on the aggravated battery charge. In support of his position, appellant relies upon the following testimony of the victim: "Q. You have not been able to hear anything at all since the time you were shot? A. Well, when I go to the doctor, if I put on ear phones, I can hear a slight beep sometimes. Q. That's in your left ear? A. Yes, sir. Q. So you can hear something in your left ear, can you not? A. A slight beep sometimes. Other than that, I can't like just talking, or something like that, I can't hear anything like that." However, even assuming that appellant has "standing" to challenge a ruling relating to an offense of which appellant was not convicted, we find no error. Where an ear is capable of hearing no more than a "slight beep," it has been "rendered useless" for purposes of Code § 26-1305.

2. Appellant's contention that the indictment cannot support a conviction for aggravated assault is controlled adversely to him by Tuggle v. State, 145 Ga.App. 603, 244 S.E.2d 131 (1978). See also Williams v. State, 144 Ga.App. 130, 240 S.E.2d 890 (1977). The indictment alleged all essential elements of the offense of aggravated assault.

Judgment affirmed.

QUILLIAN, P. J., and BIRDSONG, J., concur.

To continue reading

Request your trial
6 cases
  • Lindo v. State
    • United States
    • Georgia Court of Appeals
    • March 15, 2006
    ...thus suffering an aggravated battery." Miller v. State, 275 Ga. 730, 732(1), 571 S.E.2d 788 (2002). See also Jackson v. State, 153 Ga.App. 584, 585(1), 266 S.E.2d 273 (1980) (victim deprived of hearing where ear is capable of hearing no more than a "slight beep"). A motion for a directed ve......
  • In re A.D.
    • United States
    • Georgia Court of Appeals
    • January 28, 2009
    ...with aid of braces and walker, legs had been rendered useless for purposes of aggravated battery statute); Jackson v. State, 153 Ga.App. 584-585(1), 266 S.E.2d 273 (1980) (ear was rendered useless despite fact that it was capable of hearing a "slight beep" when aided by ear ...
  • Webb v. State
    • United States
    • Georgia Court of Appeals
    • September 17, 1997
    ...State, 220 Ga.App. 134, 137(1)(a), 469 S.E.2d 318 (1996); see also Taylor v. State, supra; Magsby v. State, supra; Jackson v. State, 153 Ga.App. 584, 266 S.E.2d 273 (1980). Such evidence is sufficient to justify the trial court's denial of a directed verdict of 3. Webb also complains that t......
  • Taylor v. State, 71653
    • United States
    • Georgia Court of Appeals
    • April 23, 1986
    ...that the victim suffer the total loss of his member in order to be the victim of an aggravated battery. See Jackson v. State, 153 Ga.App. 584 (1), 266 S.E.2d 273 (1980). Blurred vision is evidence that an eye has been rendered useless. See Collins v. State, 164 Ga.App. 482 (1), 297 S.E.2d 5......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT