Jackson v. State, 43285

Decision Date11 January 1965
Docket NumberNo. 43285,43285
Citation251 Miss. 529,170 So.2d 438
PartiesHouston JACKSON v. STATE of Mississippi.
CourtMississippi Supreme Court

Robert E. Arrington, Lawrence D. Arrington, Hattiesburg, for appellant.

Joe T. Patterson, Atty. Gen., by G. Garland Lyell, Jr., Asst. Atty. Gen., Jackson, for appellee.

ETHRIDGE, Justice.

Houston Jackson, appellant, was convicted in the Circuit Court of Pearl River County of obtaining money under false pretences by the issuance of a bad check. He contends that he was entitled to a peremptory instruction or at least that the verdict is contrary to the great weight of the evidence. However, we affirm the judgment.

The pertinent statute makes it a felony for any person, with intent to defraud, to issue a check ($25 or more) to another person for value on a bank, 'and thereby obtain from such other person any money, goods or other property of value,' where he has no funds on deposit in such bank to cover the check, and it is not paid by the drawee. Miss.Code Ann. Sec. 2153 (Supp.1963); Miss. Laws 1958, ch. 282.

Jackson's defenses are that (1) the check was executed by him for a limited purpose, as a performance bond to assure his removal of the houses given him and clearing the lot; and if not, (2) the issuance of the check by Jackson was in payment of a preexisting debt, not a contemporaneous transaction by which the property was obtained. The payment of a preexisting debt by a 'worthless check' does not come within the ban of the statute. The bad check law does not cover the obtaining of goods where they have already been delivered and have passed completely out of the seller's possession. So an essential element of the offense under section 2153 is the making and delivering of the check to another person for value, and thereby obtaining from such other person money, goods, or other property of value. Moore v. State, 205 Miss. 151, 38 So.2d 693 (1949); Broadus v. State, 205 Miss. 147, 38 So.2d 692 (1949); Annot., 59 A.L.R.2d 1159 (1958); 35 C.J.S. False Pretenses Sec. 21c (1960); 22 Am.Jur. False Pretenses Sec. 71 (1939); cf. Blakeney v. State, 216 Miss. 211, 62 So.2d 313 (1953) (prosecution under general false pretences statute, Miss.Code Ann. Sec. 2149, 1956).

Curtis Alexander was a businessman of Bay Springs. He owned some land in Pearl River County, in the buffer zone adjacent to the National Aeronautics and Space Authority's test center. On it were an old house and outbuildings. Fred Goolsby worked as his agent in buying and selling property. Jackson was in the house-moving business. The state's evidence was to the effect that Alexander made an agreement to sell Jackson the house and outbuildings on this lot for the sum of $800. Jackson would remove them from the tract, and clear it. In order to determine whether he should buy the house and whether it was movable, Jackson put his equipment under it and raised it from the foundation to inspect joists and other framing. The house was raised solely for that purpose but had not been moved from its location.

On May 22, 1963 Jackson gave Alexander a check on a bank in the amount of $800, which recited that it was for a house, small barn, and all outhouses. The check was presented to the drawee bank in due course, and returned to Alexander marked insufficient funds. After the check was given by Jackson to Goolsby to be forwarded to Alexander, Goolsby handed Jackson Alexander's bill of sale, and authorized Jackson to remove the buildings, which he did.

On the other hand, Jackson's version was this: The house was so old and dilapidated that it was...

To continue reading

Request your trial
6 cases
  • State v. Sinclair, 148
    • United States
    • Maryland Court of Appeals
    • 8 Mayo 1975
    ...purchased three used cars on September 5, 1968 and requested the seller to hold the check until the following week); Jackson v. State, 251 Miss. 529, 170 So.2d 438 (1965) (where the defendant gave a check 'as a bond' for performance of a contract to remove some buildings from a tract of lan......
  • State v. Jarman
    • United States
    • Nevada Supreme Court
    • 4 Marzo 1968
    ...123 So.2d 752 (Fla.App.1960); Blue Bonnet Creamery, Inc. v. Gulf Mills Association, 172 So.2d 133 (La.App.1965); Jackson v. State, 251 Miss. 529, 170 So.2d 438 (1965); 59 A.L.R.2d In reaching its conclusion in Hoyt v. Hoffman, supra, this court said: 'In this case Hoyt did not receive a ben......
  • Edmonson v. State
    • United States
    • Mississippi Court of Appeals
    • 18 Agosto 2020
    ...person for value, and thereby obtaining from such other person money, goods, or other property of value," Jackson v. State , 251 Miss. 529, 531, 170 So. 2d 438, 439 (1965), "knowing at the time of ... authorizing said check that the ... payor has not sufficient funds in or on deposit with s......
  • Hindman v. State, 51194
    • United States
    • Mississippi Supreme Court
    • 9 Enero 1980
    ...Coca Cola Co. v. Davis, 168 Miss. 826, 151 So. 743 (1934). The gravamen of the offense was succinctly stated in Jackson v. State, 251 Miss. 529, 170 So.2d 438 (1965): "So an essential element of the offense under section 2153 is the making and delivering of the check to another person for v......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT