Jackson v. United Parcel Service

Decision Date23 May 1994
PartiesDawn JACKSON, Appellant, v. UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, et al., Respondents.
CourtNew York Supreme Court — Appellate Division

Peters, Berger & Koshel, P.C., Brooklyn (Bonnie B. Berger, of counsel), for appellant.

Debra A. DiCicco, Brooklyn (Deborah F. Peters, of counsel), for respondents.

Before BRACKEN, J.P., and MILLER, COPERTINO, SANTUCCI and ALTMAN, JJ.

MEMORANDUM BY THE COURT.

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Spodek, J.), dated February 10, 1992, which granted the defendants' motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

ORDERED that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, and the defendants' motion is denied.

The plaintiff met her burden of establishing a prima facie case of serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102(d) (see, Licari v. Elliott, 57 N.Y.2d 230, 455 N.Y.S.2d 570, 441 N.E.2d 1088; cf., Lopez v. Senatore, 65 N.Y.2d 1017, 494 N.Y.S.2d 101, 484 N.E.2d 130). In opposition to the defendants' motion for summary judgment, the plaintiff submitted her own affidavit and excerpts from her examination before trial in which she complained of persistent pain and restriction of movement. In addition, the plaintiff submitted sworn affidavits from her treating physicians stating that she suffered a disc herniation at L5/S1, and that this condition would be permanent. The evidence submitted by the defendants was contradictory, creating issues of fact for a jury to determine (see, Morsellino v. Frankel, 161 A.D.2d 748, 556 N.Y.S.2d 103).

To continue reading

Request your trial
40 cases
  • Collymore-Maynard v. Gayle-Lyken
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court
    • June 13, 2023
    ...fact as to whether the Plaintiff suffered serious injuries, in order to avoid dismissal of the action. See Jackson v United Parcel Serv., 204 A.D.2d 605 [2d Dept 1994]; Bryan v Brancato, 213 A.D.2d 577 [2d Dept 1995], In this regard, the Plaintiff must submit quantitative objective findings......
  • Amirova v. JND Trans Inc.
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court
    • December 6, 2019
    ...prove that there are triable issues of fact as to whether the Plaintiff suffered serious injuries. See Jackson v United Parcel Serv., 204 A.D.2d 605 [2nd Dept, 1994]; Bryan v Brancato, 213 A.D.2d 577 [2nd Dept, 1995]. In this regard, the Plaintiff must submit quantitative objective findings......
  • Winston v. Shim
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court
    • April 23, 2023
    ...as to whether the Plaintiff suffered serious injuries, in order to avoid the dismissal of his action. See Jackson v United Parcel Serv., 204 A.D.2d 605 [2d Dept 1994]; Bryan v Brancato, 213 A.D.2d 577 [2d Dept 1995]. In this regard, the Plaintiff must submit quantitative objective findings,......
  • Valencia v. Martinez
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court
    • June 2, 2022
    ... ... in order to avoid the dismissal of her action. See ... Jackson v United Parcel Serv., 204 A.D.2d 605 ... [2d Dept 1994]; Bryan v ... ...
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT