Jacobs v. Omaha Life Ass'n.
Decision Date | 15 November 1898 |
Citation | 146 Mo. 523,48 S.W. 462 |
Parties | JACOBS v. OMAHA LIFE ASS'N. |
Court | Missouri Supreme Court |
1. A life policy provided for annual premiums based on insured's age, and stated that they were advance deposits to pay the death losses and the expenses of insurer. Out of the premiums two funds were created, and death losses were payable therefrom only. Premiums paid in to pay such losses, and not used for that purpose, were to be applied on future premiums. When the reserve fund reached a stated sum, dividends were to be declared therefrom, which policy holders might use in paying premiums, in purchasing paid-up insurance, or might leave with the company for investment, or receive them in cash on surrender of the policy. After 15 years the policy was to become full paid. It further stipulated that nothing in the policy should be a bar to a call for contributions in excess of those provided in case of a deficiency in the mortuary fund. Held, that the policy was a premium, and not an assessment, policy, under Rev. St. 1889, § 5855, requiring an assessment policy to show that the liabilities of members are not fixed or artificial premiums, and section 5860, defining "assessment insurance" as an insurance contract, the benefit of which is dependent on the collection of an assessment from persons holding similar contracts, and hence was subject to Rev. St. 1889, § 5849, providing that policies shall not be rendered void for misrepresentations in securing them, except for such as actually contribute to the contingency or event on which the policy is to become due.
2. When applying for a policy, insured executed his note, payable to insurer's agent individually, who indorsed it and discounted it; giving insured a receipt for the premium, which he reported to the company as paid, and for which he accounted. The policy, executed the day following, recited that it was given in consideration of payment of the first premium in cash on or before its delivery. After insured's death the note was paid by his estate. Held, that there was a cash payment of the premium, within a provision of the policy requiring that to be done before the policy took effect.
Appeal from circuit court, Ray county; E. J. Broaddus, Judge.
Action by Lizzie C. Jacobs against the Omaha Life Association. There was a judgment for plaintiff, and defendant appeals. Affirmed.
Lavelock & Kirkpatrick, P. P. Divilbliss, and Byron G. Burbank, for appellant. J. W. Garner and C. T. Garner, for respondent.
This is an action upon a policy of insurance for $5,000 issued by the defendant to Robertson L. Jacobs, payable to his wife, Lizzie C. Jacobs, the plaintiff, and dated the 1st day of June, 1894. Robertson L. Jacobs died on the 29th day of June, 1894; and the suit was instituted by his widow on the 9th of April, 1895, in the Ray county circuit court, where the defendant obtained judgment, from which the plaintiff appealed to this court. On the 7th of December, 1897, the judgment of the circuit court was reversed by this court, and the case remanded to the circuit court. 142 Mo. 49, 43 S. W. 375. On the second trial the plaintiff obtained judgment for the sum of $4,417.02, from which the defendant appeals. The pleadings in the case and the policy are set forth in the opinion on the former appeal, and need not be repeated here. It appeared from the evidence that on the 16th of March, 1893, the said Robertson L. Jacobs had his leg broken, which was then set and treated by Dr. Buchanan and his family physician, Dr. Jacobs. In his application, which was made a part of the contract of insurance by the policy, the following interrogatories and answers appear: The first question before us is substantially the same as on the former appeal; i. e. whether or not the incorrect answers of the applicant in respect to the date of his injury, and of the medical attention received therefor, vitiated the policy.
1. On the former appeal we held that the character of the contract was put in issue, and that, "if the contract was not on the assessment plan, then the false date of the injury will not avoid it, unless material to the risk," and said: On the trial anew in the circuit court the defendant introduced in evidence the second and third pages of the policy, and it contends that it appears therefrom that the contract of insurance was on the assessment plan; and this is the principal question in the case. The evidence on said pages bearing upon the character of the contract, is as follows:
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Kribs v. United Order of Foresters
... ... fraternal order is not rejection for life insurance, and the ... allegations pleaded constitute no defense. The ... 769; Wright v ... Fraternities Health and Accident Assn., 107 Me. 418, 21 ... L.R.A. (N. S.) 461; 78 A. 475. (3) The questions ... of the express terms of our statute. [See Jacobs v. Life ... Ass'n, 146 Mo. 523, 48 S.W. 462; Williams v ... Ins. Co., ... ...
-
Dodt v. Prudential Insurance Company of America
... ... 6937, R. S. Mo. 1909; Ashford v. Ins ... Co., 98 Mo.App. 505; Jacobs v. Life Assn., 146 ... Mo. 523; Aloe v. Life Assn., 164 Mo. 675; ... ...
-
Keller v. Home Life Insurance Company
...this court, abolishes the distinction formerly made between warranties and representations and places them on an equal footing. Jacob v. Life Ass'n, 146 Mo. 523; Aloe v. Fidelity Mut. Life Ass'n, 164 Mo. Scheurmann v. Life Ins. Co., 165 Mo. 641; Kern v. Legion of Honor, 167 Mo. 471; Jenkins......
-
Salts v. Prudential Ins. Company
...and unless it be so shown to the satisfaction of the jury that such representations although false, constitute no defense. Jacobs v. Insurance Co., 146 Mo. 523; Deem v. Insurance Co., 86 Mo.App. 459; v. Insurance Co., 165 Mo. 641; Jenkins v. Insurance Co., 171 Mo. 375; Williams v. Insurance......