Jacobs v. United States
Citation | 45 F.2d 34 |
Decision Date | 19 December 1930 |
Docket Number | No. 5852.,5852. |
Parties | JACOBS v. UNITED STATES. |
Court | United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (5th Circuit) |
A. A. Kelly, of South Pittsburgh, Tenn., and Chas. C. Moore, of Chattanooga, Tenn., for appellant.
C. B. Kennamer, U. S. Atty., of Birmingham, Ala. and R. M. Sims, Asst. U. S. Atty., of Florence, Ala.
Before BRYAN and WALKER, Circuit Judges, and HOLMES, District Judge.
This was a suit under the Tucker Act, 28 USCA § 41(20). The appellant sought to recover the alleged amount of damage caused by a dam constructed by the appellee under acts of Congress across the bed or channel of the Tennessee river, in Jackson county, Ala., at a location known as "Widow's Bar," to a farm owned by appellant and lying along Jones creek, a tributary of the Tennessee river, which dam was about eight miles below that farm and the mouth of Jones creek, and was completed about October 1, 1925. The court's findings of fact included, in addition to findings to the effect that that dam was constructed as above stated and for the purpose of providing water of sufficient depth throughout the year to facilitate navigation of the Tennessee river along its course, the following:
In the argument for appellant attention was called to provisions of two general rivers and harbors acts. One of those provisions, contained in such act approved July 27, 1916, made appropriation "for continuing improvement by the construction of locks and dams between Chattanooga, Tennessee, and Browns Island, Alabama, in accordance with the report submitted in House Document Numbered Three hundred sixty, Sixty-second Congress, second session, as modified by the report of the Board of Engineers for Rivers and Harbors, printed in Rivers and Harbors Committee Document Numbered One, Sixty-fourth Congress, first session, * * * Provided, That no contract shall be entered into for the construction thereof until the local interests shall assume and pay all claims for flowage damage or arrange to do so in manner satisfactory to the Secretary of War: Provided further, That one high dam or two low dams may *...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
National By-Products, Inc. v. United States
...of the lands for which the Government was bound to make just compensation under the Fifth Amendment. The opinion of the lower court, 45 F.2d 34 (C.A. 5 1930), reveals that the construction of a dam downstream from plaintiff's property caused him to suffer overflows in addition to and greate......
-
Webb v. Union Elec. Co. of Mo.
... ... 597 (en banc, 1912); U.S. v ... Cress, 243 U.S. 316, 37 S.Ct. 380 (1916); Jacobs v ... U.S., 45 F.2d 34 (5 C. C. A. 1930). Where a landowner ... brings an action against a ... An opinion of a lay ... witness as to climatic conditions is inadmissible when United ... States Weather Bureau records of such conditions are ... available. Carter v. Zollinger, ... ...
-
United States v. CHICAGO, M., ST. P. & PR CO.
...of artificial dams." See, also, United States v. Chicago, B. & Q. R. Co., 8 Cir., 82 F.2d 131, 134, 106 A.L. R. 942; Jacobs v. United States, 5 Cir., 45 F.2d 34, 37; Jacobs v. United States, 290 U.S. 13, 54 S.Ct. 26, 78 L.Ed. 142, 96 A.L. R. The opinion in the Cress case does not disclose t......
-
Renninger v. State
...the rule applied to the case at bar would make the Sanguinetti case applicable, as clearly appears from the analysis in Jacobs v. United States, 5 Cir., 45 F.2d 34, which by ultimate approval in 290 U.S. 13, 54 S.Ct. 26, 27, 78 L.Ed. 142, 96 A.L.R. 1, thus reaffirmed the rule as to what con......